Table 3.
UHR candidate sample best-fit properties and integrated high-redshift probabilities from Bagpipes and fully open priors reported in Table B.1.
| ID | Name | zhigh | log Mhigh | AV, high | zlow | log Mlow | AV, low | ∫P(z > 8) dz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-31863 | BUDIARA | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.87 |
| U-34120 | VICIADGO | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.88 |
| U-75985 | LIZZAN | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.62 |
| U-80918 | NASPE | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.80 |
| A-22691 | ARCERIO | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.98 |
Notes. For each object, we consider all Bagpipes runs performed over the full redshift prior range (0 ≤ z ≤ 25) and for all combinations of star-formation histories and dust attenuation laws explored. Given the typically bimodal shape of the resulting P(z) distributions, we identify the best-fit solutions at z ≤ 8 (“low”) and z > 8 (“high”) as those yielding the lowest χ2 value within each redshift regime. The reported best-fit parameters (redshift z, stellar mass log M/M⊙, and dust attenuation AV) are those corresponding to these two solutions, while their uncertainties are derived as the 16th–84th percentile range around the best-fit values of each physical quantities. The integrated probability ∫P(z > 8),dz is instead computed over the full prior range (0 ≤ z ≤ 25) and considering the combination of SFH and dust law that minimizes χ2 at z > 8. The full list of physical parameters is reported in Table D.1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.





























