Ultrahigh-redshift or closer-by, dust-obscured galaxies? - Deciphering the nature of faint, previously missed F200W dropouts in CEERS

Open Access

Table 4.

Best-fit Bagpipes parameters for the remaining F200W dropouts.

ID	Name	z	log M/M_⊙	A_V
U-53105	–	$2 . 60_{- 1.08}^{+ 2.70}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 2.60^{+2.70}_{-1.08} $$	$8 . 31_{- 0.53}^{+ 0.64}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 8.31^{+0.64}_{-0.53} $$	$2 . 94_{- 1.47}^{+ 1.78}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 2.94^{+1.78}_{-1.47} $$
U-112842	CURION	$5 . 53_{- 0.04}^{+ 0.02}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 5.53^{+0.02}_{-0.04} $$	$7 . 21_{- 0.12}^{+ 0.11}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 7.21^{+0.11}_{-0.12} $$	$1 . 01_{- 0.28}^{+ 0.29}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 1.01^{+0.29}_{-0.28} $$
A-26130	–	$2 . 04_{- 0.76}^{+ 2.77}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 2.04^{+2.77}_{-0.76} $$	$8 . 78_{- 0.46}^{+ 0.62}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 8.78^{+0.62}_{-0.46} $$	$3 . 25_{- 1.60}^{+ 1.78}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 3.25^{+1.78}_{-1.60} $$
A-76468	–	$3 . 63_{- 1.06}^{+ 4.98}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 3.63^{+4.98}_{-1.06} $$	$8 . 94_{- 0.53}^{+ 0.67}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 8.94^{+0.67}_{-0.53} $$	$3 . 73_{- 1.83}^{+ 1.42}$ $Mathematical equation: $ 3.73^{+1.42}_{-1.83} $$

Notes. Best-fit redshifts, stellar masses, and dust attenuations inferred from Bagpipes SED fits for the four additional F200W dropouts in our sample. All fits adopt the best-fitting SFH type reported in Table F.1.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.