Open Access

Table 2.

Literature values of bulk flow from different methods and data, grouped for every 50 Mpc/h interval by horizontal lines.

No. Authors dsph [Mpc/h] BSGX [km/s] BSGY [km/s] BSGZ [km/s] |B| [km/s]
1 Ma et al. (2011) 33 −283.9 73.2 −172.2 340
2 Qin et al. (2021) 35 −353.7 −25.7 −129.9 376
3 Hong et al. (2014) 40 −271.4 44.3 −99.2 292.3
4 Qin et al. (2018) 40 −250.4 113 −86 288
5 Whitford et al. (2023) 49 −382 48 −135 408
6 Watkins et al. (2009) 50 −347.7 78.7 −196.3 407
7 Watkins & Feldman (2015) 50 −251 60 −136.3 292

8 Ma & Pan (2014) 58 −231.2 58.9 −164.8 290
9 Scrimgeour et al. (2016) 70 −186.1 155 19.2 243
10 Courtois et al. (2025) 100 −257 58 −120 289
11 Feldman et al. (2010) 100 −337.4 69.6 −233.2 416
12 Nusser & Davis (2011) 100 −198 61 −151 257

13 Howlett et al. (2022) 139 −345 −88 −75 381
14 Watkins et al. (2023) 150 −360.8 −25.5 −137.6 387
15 Peery et al. (2018) 150 282
16 Hoffman et al. (2015) 150 −196 59 −123 239

17 Whitford et al. (2023) 173 −391 −119 −126 428
18 Watkins et al. (2023) 200 −391 −43 −143 419
19 Hoffman et al. (2024) 200 −267 −8 −111 292

20 Courtois et al. (2023) 300 1 299 −29 230

Notes. Entry numbers refers to Fig. 9.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.