Open Access
Table E.1.
Performance of color-based selections.
| Selection | TP | FN | FP | P | C | Cand. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| Bañados et al. (2016) | 28 | 3 | 39 | 42% | 90% | 28526 |
| Wang et al. (2019) | 3 | 28 | 3 | 40% | 11% | 1892 |
| Yang et al. (2023) | 51 | 18 | 7 | 88% | 74% | 39924 |
| Wolf et al. (2024) | 18 | 13 | 53 | 25% | 58% | 2344 |
| CL+SED fitting | 52 | 17 | 10 | 84% | 75% | 1438 |
Notes: Col (1): Candidate selection; Col (2): True positives; Col (3): False negatives; Col (4): False positives; Col (5): Precision; Col (6): Completeness; Col (7): Number of candidates selected.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.