Open Access

Table A.8

Parameter posteriors of our best model, against the results published by Lovis et al. (2005).

Parameter name Symbol Unit Prior Posterior
This work Lovis et al. (2005)
LTF parameters
Period Pcyc d Ulog(4000, 104) 5870350+480Mathematical equation: $5870^{+480}_{-350}$
RV phase ϕcyc, 0 U(0, 1)w 0.8370.043+0.037Mathematical equation: $0.837^{+0.037}_{-0.043}$
RV semi-amplitude kcyc, 0 m s−1 U(0, 40) 14.61.2+1.3Mathematical equation: $14.6^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$
FWHM phase ϕcyc, 1 U(0, 1)w 0.8640.070+0.054Mathematical equation: $0.864^{+0.054}_{-0.070}$
FWHM semi-amplitude kcyc, 1 m s−1 U(0, 40) 18.43.9+3.5Mathematical equation: $18.4^{+3.5}_{-3.9}$
RV zero-order correction α0,0 m s−1 Nlm,200σlm) 4.761.49+1.18Mathematical equation: $-4.76^{+1.18}_{-1.49}$
FWHM zero-order correction α0,1 m s−1 Nlm,200σlm) 9.712.27+2.22Mathematical equation: $-9.71^{+2.22}_{-2.27}$
HARPS-pre FWHM linear drift β m s−1 d−1 U(−0.1,0.1) 0.0150(28)+(23)Mathematical equation: $0.0150^{+(23)}_{-(28)}$
Dataset parameters
HARPS-post RV offset O1,0 m s−1 N(0,5σ_0) 13.43.2+3.3Mathematical equation: $13.4^{+3.3}_{-3.2}$
HARPS-post FWHM offset O1,1 m s−1 N(0,5σ_1) 23.26.4+6.2Mathematical equation: $23.2^{+6.2}_{-6.4}$
HARPS-pre RV jitter J0,0 m s−1 U(0, 5) 0.630.37+0.38Mathematical equation: $0.63^{+0.38}_{-0.37}$
HARPS-post RV jitter J1,0 m s−1 U(0, 5) 0.290.20+0.26Mathematical equation: $0.29^{+0.26}_{-0.20}$
HARPS-pre FWHM jitter J0,1 m s−1 U(0, 5) 1.971.14+1.09Mathematical equation: $1.97^{+1.09}_{-1.14}$
HARPS-post FWHM jitter J1,1 m s−1 U(0, 5) 0.670.48+0.75Mathematical equation: $0.67^{+0.75}_{-0.48}$
Stellar-activity parameters
Timescale τ d Ulog(10, 104) 7321+33Mathematical equation: $73^{+33}_{-21}$
Period Prot d U(10,52) 32.31.3+1.2Mathematical equation: $32.3^{+1.2}_{-1.3}$
Sinescale (harmonic complexity) η Ulog(0.1,3) 0.850.17+0.26Mathematical equation: $0.85^{+0.26}_{-0.17}$
RV amplitude A0 m s−1 U(−103,103) 2.200.42+0.53Mathematical equation: $2.20^{+0.53}_{-0.42}$
RV gradient amplitude B0 m s−1 d−1 U(−103,103) 19.94.7+6.9Mathematical equation: $19.9^{+6.9}_{-4.7}$
FWHM amplitude A1 m s−1 Ulog(10−3, 103) 6.990.99+1.33Mathematical equation: $6.99^{+1.33}_{-0.99}$
GJ 1137 b
Period Pb d U(140, 150) 144.720 ± 0.029 143.58 ± 0.60
Phase ϕb U(0, 1)w 0.706 ± 0.006
Inferior-conjunction ephemeris εb JD-2450000 derived 7852.240.85+0.89Mathematical equation: $7852.24^{+0.89}_{-0.85}$ 3181.7 ± 3.0
RV semi-amplitude krv, b m s−1 U(0, 30) 19.8 ± 0.4 18.3 ± 0.5
Eccentricity eb U(0, 1) 0.1180.015+0.016Mathematical equation: $0.118^{+0.016}_{-0.015}$ 0.14 ± 0.03
Argument of periastron ωb rad U(0, 2π)w 5.83 ± 0.15 5.82 ± 0.14
Semi-major axis ab au derived 0.508 ± 0.005 0.477
Minimum mass mb sin ib MJ derived 0.451 ± 0.012 0.37
Temporal-average incident flux Φb Φ derived 1.59 ± 0.15
GJ 1137 c
Period Pc d Ulog(1, 100) 9.6412(11)+(12)Mathematical equation: $9.6412^{+(12)}_{-(11)}$
Phase ϕc U(0, 1)w 0.310 ± 0.028
Inferior-conjunction ephemeris εc JD-2450000 derived 7951.49 ± 0.27
RV semi-amplitude krv, c m s−1 U(0, 10) 1.730.23+0.24Mathematical equation: $1.73^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$
Eccentricity ec 0
Semi-major axis ac au derived 0.0835(8)
Minimum mass mc sin ic M derived 5.120.69+0.70Mathematical equation: $5.12^{+0.70}_{-0.69}$
Temporal-average incident flux Φc Φ derived 58.45.5+5.6Mathematical equation: $58.4^{+5.6}_{-5.5}$

Notes. (w)Wrapped parameter. Reported uncertainties reflect the 16th and the 84th percentiles. The standard deviation of measurements in physical quantity j is denoted σj. Uncertainties of Pc and ac are given in parentheses, to the order of the least significant figure.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.