Table 1
RRLs in different MW sub-structures identified during the first phase of the CLiMB algorithm.
| Substructure |
N (D23) |
N (CLiMB) |
∆N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ED-1 | 7 | 27 | 286% |
| ED-2 | 1 | 3 | 200% |
| GSE | 350 | 398 | 14% |
| Helmi streams | 14 | 16 | 14% |
| L-RL3 | 34 | 102 | 200% |
| L-RL64 | 1 | 1 | 0% |
| Sequoia | 35 | 35 | 0% |
| Thamnos | 26 | 48 | 85% |
| Total | 468 | 630 | 35% |
Notes. Column 1: name of the sub-structure. Column 2: number of RRLs identified in the sub-structure by cross-matching with the D23 catalogue. Column 3: number of RRLs identified in the sub-structure using the CLiMB algorithm. Column 4: percentage increase in the number of RRLs identified in each sub-structure by the CLiMB algorithm compared to D23.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.