| Issue |
A&A
Volume 701, September 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A217 | |
| Number of page(s) | 18 | |
| Section | Interstellar and circumstellar matter | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554774 | |
| Published online | 19 September 2025 | |
The Rosetta Stone Project
I. A suite of radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps
1
Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM,
91191
Gif-sur-Yvette,
France
2
INAF – Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali,
Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100,
00133
Roma,
Italy
3
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata,
Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1,
00133
Roma,
Italy
4
Universität Heidelberg, Zentrum für Astronomie, Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik,
Albert-Ueberle-Str. 2,
69120
Heidelberg,
Germany
5
Universität Heidelberg, Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen,
Im Neuenheimer Feld 205,
69120
Heidelberg,
Germany
6
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
60 Garden Street,
Cambridge,
MA
02138,
USA
7
Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Studies at Harvard University,
10 Garden Street,
Cambridge,
MA
02138,
USA
8
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia (DIFA),
Via Gobetti 93/2,
40129
Bologna,
Italy
9
INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri,
Largo E. Fermi 5,
50125
Firenze,
Italy
10
Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CNES,
LAM Marseille,
France
11
European Southern Observatory (ESO),
Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2,
85748
Garching bei Munchen,
Germany
★ Corresponding author: ugo.lebreuilly@cea.fr
Received:
26
March
2025
Accepted:
6
June
2025
Context. Star formation and, in particular, high-mass star formation are key astrophysical processes that are far from being fully understood. Unfortunately, progress in these fields is slow because observations are hard to interpret as they cannot be directly compared to numerical simulations. Synthetic observations are therefore necessary to better constrain the models.
Aims. With the Rosetta Stone project, we aim to develop an end-to-end pipeline to compare star formation simulations with observations as accurately as possible in order to study the evolution from clumps scales to stars.
Methods. Using the adaptive mesh-refinement code RAMSES, we computed a first grid of model of star-forming clumps to develop our pipeline and explore the impact of the clump initial conditions on their evolution. The main purpose of this set of simulations is to be converted into synthetic observations to enable a direct comparison with real star-forming clumps observed with Herschel and ALMA.
Results. The Rosetta Stone simulations presented here provide a catalog available for full post-processing and subsequent comparison with observations (RS1). Among all the parameters explored here, the strength of the magnetic field has the strongest influence on the clump evolution (fragmentation, star formation, global collapse) at both large and small scales. Numerical parameters such as the resolution per Jeans length or the threshold for accretion onto sink particles affects the formation of low-mass sinks. Finally, the widely used L/M ratio is found to be a good indicator of the clump evolutionary state regardless of its initial condition, but this could change when more feedback processes (jets, HII regions) are included.
Conclusions. We now have a new suite of simulations of star-forming clumps that is available for full post-processing and subsequent comparison with the observations.
Key words: magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) / radiative transfer / turbulence / stars: protostars / ISM: clouds / ISM: magnetic fields
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.