| Issue |
A&A
Volume 702, October 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A247 | |
| Number of page(s) | 24 | |
| Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554780 | |
| Published online | 28 October 2025 | |
Three-dimensional stacking as a line intensity mapping statistic
1
California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
2
Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 726 Broadway, New York, NY 10003, USA
3
Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA
4
Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
5
Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
6
Département de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève, 24 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4, Switzerland
7
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada
8
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada
9
David A. Dunlap Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada
10
Department of Physics, University of Miami, 1320 Campo Sano Avenue, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
11
Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
⋆ Corresponding author: ddunne@astro.caltech.edu
Received:
26
March
2025
Accepted:
8
August
2025
Line intensity mapping (LIM) is a growing technique that measures the integrated spectral line emission from unresolved galaxies over a three-dimensional region of the Universe. Although LIM experiments ultimately aim to provide powerful cosmological constraints via auto-correlation, many LIM experiments are also designed to take advantage of overlapping galaxy surveys, thus enabling joint analyses of two datasets. We introduce a flexible simulation pipeline that can generate mock galaxy surveys and mock LIM data simultaneously for the same population of simulated galaxies. Using this pipeline, we explore a simple joint analysis technique: three-dimensional co-addition (stacking) of LIM data on the positions of galaxies from a traditional galaxy catalogue. We test how the output of this technique reacts to changes in experimental design of both the LIM experiment and the galaxy survey, its sensitivity to various astrophysical parameters, and its susceptibility to common systematic errors. We find that an ideal catalogue for a stacking analysis targets as many high-mass dark matter halos as possible. We also find that the signal in a LIM stacking analysis originates almost entirely from the large-scale clustering of halos around the catalogue objects rather than the catalogue objects themselves. While stacking is a sensitive and conceptually simple way to achieve a LIM detection, thus providing a valuable way to validate a LIM auto-correlation detection, it will likely require a full cross-correlation to achieve further characterisation of the galaxy tracers involved, as the cosmological and astrophysical parameters we explore here have degenerate effects on the stack.
Key words: methods: data analysis / ISM: molecules / galaxies: high-redshift / large-scale structure of Universe
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.