| Issue |
A&A
Volume 704, December 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A183 | |
| Number of page(s) | 14 | |
| Section | Planets, planetary systems, and small bodies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556911 | |
| Published online | 10 December 2025 | |
Icy or rocky? Convective or stable?
New interior models of Uranus and Neptune
Department of Astrophysics, University of Zürich,
Winterthurerstrasse 190,
8057
Zürich,
Switzerland
★ Corresponding author: luca.morf@uzh.ch
Received:
19
August
2025
Accepted:
27
September
2025
We present a new framework for constructing agnostic and yet physical models for planetary interiors and apply it to Uranus and Neptune. Unlike previous research that either impose rigid assumptions or rely on simplified empirical profiles, our approach bridges both paradigms. Starting from randomly generated density profiles, we applied an iterative algorithm that converges towards models that simultaneously satisfy hydrostatic equilibrium, match the observed gravitational moments, and remain thermodynamically and compositionally consistent. The inferred interior models for Uranus and Neptune span a wide range of possible interior structures, in particular encompassing both water-dominated and rock-dominated configurations (rock-to-water mass ratios between 0.04–3.92 for Uranus and 0.20–1.78 for Neptune). All models contain convective regions with ionic water and have temperature–pressure profiles that remain above the demixing curves for hydrogen–helium–water mixtures. This offers both a plausible explanation for the observed non-dipolar magnetic fields and indicates that no hydrogen–helium–water demixing occurs. We find a higher H-He mass fraction in the outer-most convection zones for Uranus (0.62–0.73) compared to Neptune (0.25–0.49) and that Uranus’ magnetic field is likely generated deeper in the interior compared to Neptune. We infer upper limits of 0.69–0.74 (Uranus) versus 0.78–0.92 (Neptune) for the outer edges of the dynamo regions in units of normalised radii. Overall, our findings challenge the conventional classification of Uranus and Neptune as ’ice giants’ and underscore the need for improved observational data or formation constraints to break compositional degeneracy.
Key words: planets and satellites: interiors / planets and satellites: magnetic fields / planets and satellites: individual: Uranus / planets and satellites: individual: Neptune
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.