| Issue |
A&A
Volume 707, March 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A337 | |
| Number of page(s) | 15 | |
| Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558383 | |
| Published online | 18 March 2026 | |
The effect of baryons on the positions and velocities of satellite galaxies in the MTNG simulation
1
Facultad de Física. Universidad de Sevilla. Multidisciplinary Unit for Energy Science, Av. Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012 Seville, Spain
2
Donostia International Physics Center, Manuel Lardizabal Ibilbidea, 4, 20018 Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain
3
IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
4
Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
5
Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
6
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, United Kingdom
7
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
8
Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, United States of America
9
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
★ Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
3
December
2025
Accepted:
16
February
2026
Abstract
Mock galaxy catalogues are often constructed from dark-matter-only simulations based on the galaxy–halo connection. Although modern mocks can reproduce galaxy clustering to some extent, the absence of baryons affects the spatial and kinematic distributions of galaxies in ways that remain insufficiently quantified. We compare the positions and velocities of satellite galaxies in the MTNG hydrodynamic simulation – a state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamic run – with those in its dark-matter-only counterpart, assessing how baryonic effects influence galaxy clustering and contrasting them with the impact of galaxy selection, i.e. the dependence of clustering on sample definition. We introduce a new method to track subhaloes using the merger trees of the simulations, which enables us to match systems even when their positions at z = 0 differ. We then compute positional and velocity offsets as functions of halo mass and distance from the halo centre, and use these to construct a subhalo catalogue from the dark-matter-only simulation that reproduces the galaxy distribution in the hydrodynamic run. Satellites in the hydrodynamic simulation lie 3–4% closer to halo centres than in the dark-matter-only case, with an offset that is nearly constant with halo mass and increases towards smaller radii. Satellite velocities are also systematically higher in the dark-matter-only run, with differences that grow towards lower halo masses and radii. At scales of 0.1 h−1 Mpc, these spatial and kinematic differences produce 10–20% variations in clustering amplitude – corresponding to 1–3σ assuming DESI-like errors – though the impact decreases at larger scales. We repeat the analysis in zoom-in simulations with varied physical models and find consistent trends. These baryonic effects are relevant for cosmological and lensing analyses and should be accounted for when building high-fidelity mocks. However, they remain smaller than the differences introduced by galaxy selection, which thus represents the dominant source of uncertainty when constructing mocks based on observable quantities.
Key words: galaxies: evolution / galaxies: formation / galaxies: statistics / large-scale structure of Universe
© The Authors 2026
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.