| Issue |
A&A
Volume 708, April 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A191 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Interstellar and circumstellar matter | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202658854 | |
| Published online | 06 April 2026 | |
The extinction distances for over a thousand planetary nebulae with Gaia measurements
1
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing
100875,
PR
China
2
Institute for Frontiers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing
102206,
PR
China
3
CAS Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing
100101,
PR
China
4
Department of Astronomy, China West Normal University,
Nanchong
637000,
PR
China
★ Corresponding authors: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
4
January
2026
Accepted:
3
March
2026
Abstract
Context. Although Gaia has identified the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) for about 70% of known Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe), reliable distance estimates remain highly incomplete, with fewer than one quarter having accurate parallaxes. Mean-while, the classical extinction–distance sample has long been limited to about 70 objects, accounting for only 1.8 of the Galactic PNe population.
Aims. We aim to obtain a large and homogeneous catalogue of PN distances by refining extinction–distance measurements with Gaia DR3, providing a complementary method to CSPN-parallax-based distances.
Methods. We developed a Gaia-based extinction–distance method for PNe by combining an improved blue-edge approach with an extinction-jump model. Planetary nebula distances were inferred from stellar extinction jumps in line-of-sight extinction–distance profiles and constrained by comparisons with published distances, stellar spatial distributions relative to the PN centre, and the PN radius–distance relation.
Results. We obtain distances for 1066 PNe, with a median relative uncertainty of 13% and below 20% for about 87% of the sample. This sample includes 765 objects whose CSPN parallaxes have relative uncertainties greater than 20% and 128 objects without CSPN parallaxes. Our method not only complements CSPN parallax-based approaches for PN distance determination but also extends the traditional extinction-based approach to higher Galactic latitudes. In cases where published distance estimates for the same PN differ significantly, the method helps identify the more reliable distance. In addition, it helps evaluate the reliability of CSPN identifications. We find a likely misidentification in the reported CSPN for Fr2–36, and further analyse 33 PNe with two different CSPNe identifications, suggesting a more suitable CSPN for 15 objects. The resulting catalogue is the largest homogeneous set of extinction-based PN distances to date and provides a robust benchmark for studies of Galactic structure, PN populations, and interstellar extinction.
Key words: stars: distances / stars: evolution / dust, extinction / planetary nebulae: general
© The Authors 2026
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.