| Issue | 
											A&A
									 Volume 496, Number 2, March III 2009				 | |
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | L5 - L8 | |
| Section | Letters | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200911689 | |
| Published online | 18 February 2009 | |
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
HD 60532, a planetary system in a 3:1 mean motion resonance
J. Laskar1 - A. C. M. Correia1,2
1 - ASD, IMCCE, CNRS-UMR8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France  
  
  
2 - 
Departamento de Física, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal 
  
Received 20 January 2009 / Accepted 3 February 2009
Abstract
A recent paper has reported that there is a planetary system around the star HD 60532, composed of two giant planets in a possible 3:1 mean motion resonance, which should be confirmed within the next decade. Here we show that the analysis of the global dynamics of the system already
allows this resonance to be confirmed. The present best fit to the data  corresponds to this resonant configuration, and the system is stable for at least 5 Gyr. The 3:1 resonance is so robust that stability is still possible for a wide variety of orbital parameters around the best-fit
solution and would also be if the inclination of the system orbital plane is as small as  with respect to the plane of the sky. Moreover, if the inclination is taken as a free parameter in the adjustment to observations, we find an inclination
with respect to the plane of the sky. Moreover, if the inclination is taken as a free parameter in the adjustment to observations, we find an inclination 
 ,
which corresponds to
,
which corresponds to 
 and
and 
 for the planetary companions.
for the planetary companions.
Key words: stars: individual: HD 60532 - stars: planetary systems - techniques: radial velocities - methods: numerical
1 Introduction
A recent paper (Desort et al.  2008, hereafter DES08) reported detecting two planetary
mass companions around the F type star   HD 60532. Using the data acquired with the HARPS spectrograph based on the 3.6-m ESO telescope at La Silla Observatory  and a two-Keplerian fit to the data, the orbits of the two bodies were determined, corresponding to minimum masses of 1.03 
 and 2.46
and 2.46 
 with 201-day and 604-day periods, respectively.
The dynamical study done in DES08 suggested a possible 3:1 resonance, but the stability of the results seemed to be questionable, as small variations in the semi-major axis led to a non resonant solution (DES08). Therefore, the authors   concluded that the existence of a mean motion resonance would require an additional decade of observations before being confirmed.
with 201-day and 604-day periods, respectively.
The dynamical study done in DES08 suggested a possible 3:1 resonance, but the stability of the results seemed to be questionable, as small variations in the semi-major axis led to a non resonant solution (DES08). Therefore, the authors   concluded that the existence of a mean motion resonance would require an additional decade of observations before being confirmed.
The presence of two or more interacting planets in a system dramatically increases our ability to constrain and understand the processes of planetary formation and evolution. The dynamical analysis of these systems is then very useful, first for constraining the system evolution history and second for determining the system ``structure'' in terms of orbital content. Among the known multi-planet systems, a significant fraction present strong interactions and are trapped in mean motion resonances. The resonances between planets are believed to be formed after the inward or outward migration of the planets during the early stages of the system's formation (e.g. Tsiganis et al. 2005).
By performing a detailed dynamical analysis of the HD 60532 system in conformity with the radial-velocity observations, we can confirm this system in a 3:1 mean-motion resonance and provide some constraints on the inclination of the system orbital plane with respect to the plane of the sky. In Sect. 2 we analyze the observational data obtained with the HARPS spectrograph. The 3:1 resonance and the dynamical analysis of the system are discussed in Sects. 3 and 4. Section 5 contains some additional constraints, and conclusions drawn in Sect. 6.
2 Orbital solution for the HD 60532 system
The 147 published radial-velocity data points of HD 60532 (DES08) were taken with the   HARPS spectrograph from February 2006 until June 2008.  A two-companion Keplerian solution is provided in DES08, but because of the strong mutual interactions between the two planets, these parameters present strong variations  and cannot be used in dynamical studies unless   the
initial longitudes of both planets are given. Using the iterative Levenberg-Marquardt method (Press et al.  1992), we thus re-fitted the complete set of radial velocities with a 3-body Newtonian model, assuming co-planar motion perpendicular to the plane of the sky, similarly to 
what has been done for the system   HD 45364 (Correia et al.  2009). This fit yields an adjustment of 
 and
and 
 ,
slightly better than the two-Keplerian model from DES08. The set of orbital parameters for this system (
,
slightly better than the two-Keplerian model from DES08. The set of orbital parameters for this system (
 )
is given in Table 1.
)
is given in Table 1.
Still assuming co-planar motion, we then release the perpendicularity constraint by including the inclination as a free parameter. The system readjusts the orbital parameters of the two
planets slightly  and provides an inclination around  for the best stable fit, although subjected to a large incertitude. By fixing the inclination at this value the new fit yields an adjustment of
for the best stable fit, although subjected to a large incertitude. By fixing the inclination at this value the new fit yields an adjustment of 
 and
and 
 .
In this case, the masses are increased by a factor
.
In this case, the masses are increased by a factor 
 ,
i.e.,
,
i.e., 
 and
and 
 (
(
 ,
Table 1). We also attempted to fit the data with a 3-body Newtonian model for which the inclination of the orbital planes, as well as the node of the outer planet orbit, was free to vary. We were able to find a wide variety of configurations, some with very low inclination values for one or both planets, which slightly improved the fit. However, all of these determinations are uncertain, and since we also increased the number of free parameters by three, we cannot say that these solutions present  much of an improvement with respect to the sets
,
Table 1). We also attempted to fit the data with a 3-body Newtonian model for which the inclination of the orbital planes, as well as the node of the outer planet orbit, was free to vary. We were able to find a wide variety of configurations, some with very low inclination values for one or both planets, which slightly improved the fit. However, all of these determinations are uncertain, and since we also increased the number of free parameters by three, we cannot say that these solutions present  much of an improvement with respect to the sets 
 ,
presented in Table 1.
,
presented in Table 1.
Table 1:  
Orbital parameters for the HD 60532 system 
 ,
obtained with a 3-body Newtonian fit with
,
obtained with a 3-body Newtonian fit with 
 (top) and for the system system
(top) and for the system system 
 ,
with
,
with 
 (bottom) (
(bottom) (
 ).
).
3 The 3:1 mean motion resonance
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig1.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg52.gif) | Figure 1: 
Variation in the resonant argument, 
 | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=16.6cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig2.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg53.gif) | Figure 2: 
Stability analysis of the HD 60532 planetary system for different values of the inclination (
 | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
Table 2:  
Fundamental frequencies for the orbital solution 
 (Table 1).
(Table 1).
Table 3:  
Quasi-periodic decomposition of the resonant angle 
 for  the orbital solution
for  the orbital solution 
 (Table 1).
(Table 1).
As in DES08, our nominal solution 
 (Table 1) seems to be in a 3:1 resonance. We  numerically integrated the orbits of the planets  over 100 kyr with the symplectic integrator SABAC4 of Laskar & Robutel (2001), using a step size of 0.02 years. The frequency analysis of this 
orbital solution  allows then to  conclude that it is  indeed in a 3:1 mean motion resonance, with resonant argument:
(Table 1) seems to be in a 3:1 resonance. We  numerically integrated the orbits of the planets  over 100 kyr with the symplectic integrator SABAC4 of Laskar & Robutel (2001), using a step size of 0.02 years. The frequency analysis of this 
orbital solution  allows then to  conclude that it is  indeed in a 3:1 mean motion resonance, with resonant argument: 
 .
.
The fundamental frequencies of the systems are the two mean motions nb and nc, the two secular frequencies of the periastrons g1 and g2, and the libration frequency of the resonant argument 
 (Table 3). Up to the precision of the frequency determinations  (
(Table 3). Up to the precision of the frequency determinations  ( 10-9), we have the resonant relation 
nb-3 nc + 2 g1 = 0.
10-9), we have the resonant relation 
nb-3 nc + 2 g1 = 0.
For the nominal solution 
 ,
the resonant argument
,
the resonant argument  is in libration around
is in libration around  ,
with a libration period
,
with a libration period 
 yr and an associated amplitude of about 38.138 degrees, with  multiples additional terms of significant amplitude of the form
 yr and an associated amplitude of about 38.138 degrees, with  multiples additional terms of significant amplitude of the form 
 ,
with k integer (Fig. 1a, Table 3). For the complete solution, the libration amplitude can reach 123.16 degrees because additional periodic terms are present. 
In Table 3, we provide a quasi-periodic  decomposition of the resonant angle
,
with k integer (Fig. 1a, Table 3). For the complete solution, the libration amplitude can reach 123.16 degrees because additional periodic terms are present. 
In Table 3, we provide a quasi-periodic  decomposition of the resonant angle  in terms of decreasing amplitude. All the quasi-periodic terms are easily identified as integer combinations of the fundamental frequencies (Table 3). Since the resonant angle is modulated by a relatively short period of about 38 years and high harmonics of shorter periods, the
observation of the system over a few additional years may provide an estimate of the libration amplitude and thus a strong constraint on the parameters of the system.
in terms of decreasing amplitude. All the quasi-periodic terms are easily identified as integer combinations of the fundamental frequencies (Table 3). Since the resonant angle is modulated by a relatively short period of about 38 years and high harmonics of shorter periods, the
observation of the system over a few additional years may provide an estimate of the libration amplitude and thus a strong constraint on the parameters of the system.
As in (Correia et al.  2009), both periastrons precess with mean frequency g1 that is retrograde, with a period of 754.701 years. The two periastrons are thus locked in an antipodal state, and the difference 
 is in libration around
is in libration around  with an amplitude of
with an amplitude of 
 (Fig. 1b). As a result, the arguments
(Fig. 1b). As a result, the arguments  
 and
and  
 librate around
librate around  and
and  ,
respectively,  with the same libration frequency
,
respectively,  with the same libration frequency 
 .
.
4 Stability analysis
To analyze the stability of the nominal solution and confirm the presence of the 3:1 resonance, 
we performed a global frequency analysis (Laskar  1993) in the vicinity of the nominal solution (Fig. 2), in the same way as  achieved for the HD 202206 (Correia et al.  2005) and HD 45364 (Correia et al.  2009) systems. For each planet, the system is integrated on a regular 2D mesh of initial conditions, with varying semi-major axis and eccentricity, while the other parameters are retained at their nominal values. The solution is integrated over 10 kyr for each initial condition and a stability indicator is computed 
as the variation in the measured mean motion over   two consecutive 5 kyr intervals of time.  The results, for different values of the inclination of the system (
 ),  are reported in color in Fig. 2, where ``red'' represents the strongly chaotic trajectories, and ``dark blue'' the extremely stable ones. In all these plots, the 3:1 resonant island is clearly highlighted and appears to be very stable until the inclination reaches
),  are reported in color in Fig. 2, where ``red'' represents the strongly chaotic trajectories, and ``dark blue'' the extremely stable ones. In all these plots, the 3:1 resonant island is clearly highlighted and appears to be very stable until the inclination reaches 
 ,
for which most of the resonant island is destabilized. Indeed, a numerical integration of the fitted solution for 10 degrees inclination led to a disruption of the system in 584 Myr.
,
for which most of the resonant island is destabilized. Indeed, a numerical integration of the fitted solution for 10 degrees inclination led to a disruption of the system in 584 Myr.
It is remarkable that, as for HD 45364 (Correia et al. 2009), there is perfect coincidence between the stable 3:1 resonant islands, and curves of minimal rms obtained by comparison with the observations. Moreover, for our preferred solutions, with inclination ranging from 90 to 15 degrees, the resonant island extends to high values of the rms of about 7 m/s, which reinforces the confidence that the present system is in a 3:1 resonant state.
The present dynamical analysis also indicates that this 3:1 mean motion resonance  is stable over Gyr timescales. We have also directly tested  this stability by performing a numerical integration
of the   systems 
 and
and 
 (Table 1) over 5 Gyr using the symplectic integrator SABAC4 and a step size of 0.02 years. Both solutions,
(Table 1) over 5 Gyr using the symplectic integrator SABAC4 and a step size of 0.02 years. Both solutions, 
 ,
remain stable over 5 Gyr, although their orbital elements present large variations because of the strong gravitational interactions between the two planets. For the nominal solution
,
remain stable over 5 Gyr, although their orbital elements present large variations because of the strong gravitational interactions between the two planets. For the nominal solution 
 ,
the eccentricity of the inner planet oscillates within 
0.115 < eb < 0.301, while we have 
0.0165 < ec < 0.143 for the outer planet. The    secular variations in the orbital parameters are mostly driven by the rapid secular frequency g1, of period
,
the eccentricity of the inner planet oscillates within 
0.115 < eb < 0.301, while we have 
0.0165 < ec < 0.143 for the outer planet. The    secular variations in the orbital parameters are mostly driven by the rapid secular frequency g1, of period 
 yr (Table 3). These secular variations in the orbital elements occur much more rapidly than in our Solar System, which may enable them to be detected directly from observations.
 yr (Table 3). These secular variations in the orbital elements occur much more rapidly than in our Solar System, which may enable them to be detected directly from observations.
5 Additional constraints
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig3.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg71.gif) | Figure 3: Possible location of an additional planet in the HD 60532 system. For 90 ( top) and 20 degrees ( bottom) inclination, the stability of a small mass particle in the HD 60532 system is analyzed, for various semi-major axis and eccentricity, and for K=10-6 m/s. The stable zones where additional planets could be found are the dark blue regions. | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
The stability analysis summarized in Fig. 2 shows, as in HD 45364 (Correia et al. 2009), very good agreement between the 3:1 resonant islands and the rms contour curves. We can thus assume that the dynamics of the two known planets is not disturbed much by the presence of some large planet close by.
We  tested the possibility of an additional planet in the systems 
 and
and 
 by including  a third planet, with varying   semi-major axis and eccentricity  over a wide range, and by performing  stability analysis (Fig. 3). The test was done  for a fixed K value: first with an asteroid size object (K=10-6 m/s) (Fig. 3), and then for an Earth-size object (K=0.1 m/s) without noticeable change in the dynamics.
by including  a third planet, with varying   semi-major axis and eccentricity  over a wide range, and by performing  stability analysis (Fig. 3). The test was done  for a fixed K value: first with an asteroid size object (K=10-6 m/s) (Fig. 3), and then for an Earth-size object (K=0.1 m/s) without noticeable change in the dynamics.
From this analysis, one can see (Fig. 3)  that, for 
 (
(
 ), the zone of instability extends from about 0.2 AU to about 4 AU, while for
), the zone of instability extends from about 0.2 AU to about 4 AU, while for 
 (
(
 ), no planet can be stable from 0.1 AU to about 6 AU. The eventual discovery of an additional planet in this range would thus constrain  the inclination of the system with respect to the plane of view,  and hence the planetary masses. At
), no planet can be stable from 0.1 AU to about 6 AU. The eventual discovery of an additional planet in this range would thus constrain  the inclination of the system with respect to the plane of view,  and hence the planetary masses. At 
 ,
the libration period of the 3:1 resonant argument is  39.93 yr, but this period depends strongly on the planetary masses, and thus on the inclination i of the system (Table 4). We   computed the libration period
,
the libration period of the 3:1 resonant argument is  39.93 yr, but this period depends strongly on the planetary masses, and thus on the inclination i of the system (Table 4). We   computed the libration period  for the best fit obtained at various inclinations, 
i=90,30,20,15,10 degrees. At
for the best fit obtained at various inclinations, 
i=90,30,20,15,10 degrees. At 
 ,
we have
,
we have 
 yr. As the amplitude of the libration is large, we can expect that, 
over the next decade, this resonant libration period will be constrained, allowing  good determination of the inclination and planetary masses. Indeed, if we extrapolate the differences 
of radial velocities for various inclination hypotheses (
i=30,20,15,10 degrees), compared with the nominal solution
 yr. As the amplitude of the libration is large, we can expect that, 
over the next decade, this resonant libration period will be constrained, allowing  good determination of the inclination and planetary masses. Indeed, if we extrapolate the differences 
of radial velocities for various inclination hypotheses (
i=30,20,15,10 degrees), compared with the nominal solution 
 ,
it clearly appears  that the inclination of the system will be determined 
within a few years with the HARPS data (Fig. 4).
,
it clearly appears  that the inclination of the system will be determined 
within a few years with the HARPS data (Fig. 4).
Table 4:  
Change in the mass factor ( )
and libration period
)
and libration period  with inclination (i).
with inclination (i).
6 Discussion and conclusion
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig4.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg76.gif) | Figure 4: 
Radial velocity signature of the inclination (i). The difference with respect to the nominal solution (at 
 | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
We have re-analyzed the dynamics of the two planets system HD 60532, as first reported in DES08. In contrast to the conclusions of this previous work, we believe that the global dynamical study presented here (Fig. 2) allows the unambiguous conclusion that the system is in a 3:1 mean motion resonance.
Moreover, thanks to the strong dynamical interaction present in this system, we could also fit the inclination, which led to a most probable value of 20 degrees, while our dynamical analysis set up a stability constraint to 
 .
The confidence in the existence of the 3:1 resonance is enhanced by the fact that the system remains in resonance for all the fits 
that we performed, from 90 to 15 degrees inclination. In the nominal solution (
.
The confidence in the existence of the 3:1 resonance is enhanced by the fact that the system remains in resonance for all the fits 
that we performed, from 90 to 15 degrees inclination. In the nominal solution (
 ,
Table 1), the resonant angle
,
Table 1), the resonant angle 
 is in libration around
is in libration around  ,
with a  libration period of 39.93 years and an associated amplitude of
,
with a  libration period of 39.93 years and an associated amplitude of 
 ,
although the main oscillation of this argument  is driven by the secular term g1-g2 with an associated amplitude of
,
although the main oscillation of this argument  is driven by the secular term g1-g2 with an associated amplitude of 
 ,
the total amplitude of the libration being
,
the total amplitude of the libration being 
 ,
due to additional harmonics.
,
due to additional harmonics.
The planet-planet interactions in this system are important, because of this 3:1 resonance. The dependence of the libration period with the mass factor (Table 4) should allow determination of the inclination of the orbital planes and thus of the masses of both planets within the next decade (Fig. 4).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (Portugal) and French PNP-CNRS. This work was started during a stay at Geneva Observatory, where discussions with M. Mayor and S. Udry were very helpful.
References
- Correia, A. C. M., Udry, S., Mayor, M., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 751 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
- Correia, A. C. M., Udry, S., Mayor, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 521 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Desort, M., Lagrange, A.-M., Galland, F., et al. 2008, A&A, 491, 883 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Laskar, J. 1990, Icarus, 88, 266 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Laskar, J. 1993, Physica D, 67, 257 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Laskar, J., & Robutel, P. 2001, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 80, 39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN, The art of scientific computing (Cambridge: University Press), 2nd edn. (In the text)
- Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2005, Nature, 435, 459 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
All Tables
Table 1:   
Orbital parameters for the HD 60532 system 
 ,
obtained with a 3-body Newtonian fit with
,
obtained with a 3-body Newtonian fit with 
 (top) and for the system system
(top) and for the system system 
 ,
with
,
with 
 (bottom) (
(bottom) (
 ).
).
Table 2:   
Fundamental frequencies for the orbital solution 
 (Table 1).
(Table 1).
Table 3:   
Quasi-periodic decomposition of the resonant angle 
 for  the orbital solution
for  the orbital solution 
 (Table 1).
(Table 1).
Table 4:   
Change in the mass factor ( )
and libration period
)
and libration period  with inclination (i).
with inclination (i).
All Figures
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig1.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg52.gif) | Figure 1: 
Variation in the resonant argument, 
 | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
| In the text | |
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=16.6cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig2.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg53.gif) | Figure 2: 
Stability analysis of the HD 60532 planetary system for different values of the inclination (
 | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
| In the text | |
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig3.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg71.gif) | Figure 3: Possible location of an additional planet in the HD 60532 system. For 90 ( top) and 20 degrees ( bottom) inclination, the stability of a small mass particle in the HD 60532 system is analyzed, for various semi-major axis and eccentricity, and for K=10-6 m/s. The stable zones where additional planets could be found are the dark blue regions. | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
| In the text | |
| ![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{Figures/1689fig4.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full_html/2009/11/aa11689-09/Timg76.gif) | Figure 4: 
Radial velocity signature of the inclination (i). The difference with respect to the nominal solution (at 
 | 
| Open with DEXTER | |
| In the text | |
Copyright ESO 2009
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
 
  ). For a fixed orbital inclination and initial condition of the outer  and inner planet, the phase space of the system is explored by varying the semi-major axis ak and eccentricity ek of the other planet,  b) and  c) respectively. The step size is 0.002 AU in semi-major axis and 0.005 in eccentricity. For each initial condition, the full system is integrated numerically over 10 kyr and, as in (
). For a fixed orbital inclination and initial condition of the outer  and inner planet, the phase space of the system is explored by varying the semi-major axis ak and eccentricity ek of the other planet,  b) and  c) respectively. The step size is 0.002 AU in semi-major axis and 0.005 in eccentricity. For each initial condition, the full system is integrated numerically over 10 kyr and, as in ( (red),
(red),  (violet). The available HARPS residual data are also 
plotted with their error bars.
(violet). The available HARPS residual data are also 
plotted with their error bars.