EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 519 (September 2010) A&A, 519 (2010) A73 Full HTML
Free Access

 

 

Table 2:

Data for the 13 GRBs added to the old sample described in Amati et al. (2009).

GRB 		z Ep,o (keV) $\alpha$ ($\gamma $) $\beta$ $S_{\rm obs}$ (10-6 ergs cm-2) band (keV) GCN  
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
090516 4.109 190 $\pm$ 65 -1.5 $\pm$ 0.3 [-2.2] $\pm$ [0.4] 15 $\pm$ 3 20-1200 9422  
090715B 3.00 134 $\pm$ 56 -1.1 $\pm$ 0.4 [-2.2] $\pm$ [0.4] 9.3 $\pm$ 1.5 20-2000 9679  
090812 2.452 586 $\pm$ 243 -1.03 $\pm$ 0.07 [-2.2] $\pm$ [0.4] 26.1 $\pm$ 3.4 15-1400 9821  
090926B 1.24 91 $\pm$ 2 -0.13 $\pm$ 0.06 [-2.2] $\pm$ [0.4] 8.7 $\pm$ 0.3 10-1000 9957  
091018 0.971 28 $\pm$ 16 -1.53 $\pm$ 0.59 [-2.2] $\pm$ [0.4] 1.44 $\pm$ 0.19 10-1000 10 045  
091029 2.752 61.4 $\pm$ 17.5 -1.46 $\pm$ 0.27 [-2.2] $\pm$ [0.4] 2.4 $\pm$ 0.1 15-150 10 103  
090618 0.54 155.5 $\pm$ 11 -1.26 $\pm$ 0.06 -2.50 $\pm$ 0.33 270 $\pm$ 6 8-1000 9535  
090902B 1.822 775 $\pm$ 11 -0.696 $\pm$ 0.012 -3.85 $\pm$ 0.31 374 $\pm$ 3 50-10 000 9866  
090926 2.1062 314 $\pm$ 4 -0.75 $\pm$ 0.01 -2.59 $\pm$ 0.05 145 $\pm$ 4 8-1000 9933  
091003 0.8969 486.2 $\pm$ 23.6 -1.13 $\pm$ 0.01 -2.64 $\pm$ 0.24 37.6 $\pm$ 0.4 8-1000 9983  
091020 1.71 103 $\pm$ 68 -0.93 $\pm$ 0.6 -1.9 $\pm$ 0.8 10.4 $\pm$ 2.1 20-2000 10 057  
091127 0.49 36 $\pm$ 2 -1.27 $\pm$ 0.06 -2.20 $\pm$ 0.02 18.7 $\pm$ 0.2 8-1000 10 204  
091208B 1.0633 124 $\pm$ 20.1 -1.44 $\pm$ 0.07 -2.32 $\pm$ 0.47 5.8 $\pm$ 0.2 8-1000 10 266  

Notes. In this table we show (1) the name of GRB, (2) the spectral model used for the fitting of the spectra, (3) the redshift, (4) the peak energy observed, (5) the softer spectral index, absent for the cut-off power law spectral model, (6) the higher spectral index, (7) the observed fluence and (8) the detector band considered for the estimate of the fluence, (9) the GCN reference for the GRB, where we took the spectral data.

References. (Sakamoto et al. 2009a), (McBreen 2009a), (Golenetskii et al. 2009a), (Sakamoto et al. 2009b), (Bissaldi & Connaughton 2009), (Bissaldi 2009), (Briggs 2009), (Rau 2009), (Golenetskii et al. 2009b), (Golenetskii 2009), (Barthelmy et al. 2009), (Wilson-Hodge & Preece 2009), (McBreen 2009b).


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.