Table 4
Differences in stellar parameters between this work and the EW method for the 48 sample stars.
| This work – EW | ΔTeffa (± MAD) K | Δlog g (± MAD) dex | Δ[Fe/H] (± MAD) dex | N |
|
|
||||
| Whole sample | –26 ± 14 (±55) | –0.19 ± 0.04 (±0.14) | 0.000 ± 0.010 (±0.041) | 48 |
| F-type | –97 ± 22 (±68) | –0.34 ± 0.07 (±0.18) | 0.006 ± 0.014 (±0.014) | 12 |
| G-type | 7 ± 16 (±36) | –0.07 ± 0.05 (±0.04) | 0.019 ± 0.021 (±0.032) | 18 |
| K-type | –5 ± 27 (±32) | –0.18 ± 0.05 (±0.16) | –0.027 ± 0.016 (±0.042) | 18 |
Notes. MAD values correspond to the median average deviation and are indicated in parenthesis. The differences are also listed per spectral type. N is the number of stars used for the comparison.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.