Table 2
SED of DZ Cha.
| Wavelength | Flux | Flux Dered. | Error | Ref. |
| (μm) | (mJy) | (mJy) | (%) | |
|
|
||||
| 0.15 | 2.20E-02 | 5.46E-02 | 30 | 1 |
| 0.23 | 8.50E-02 | 2.26E-01 | 30 | 1 |
| 0.44 | 7.90E+00 | 1.25E+01 | 15 | 2 |
| 0.48 | 1.38E+01 | 2.10E+01 | 15 | 2 |
| 0.55 | 2.85E+01 | 4.01E+01 | 10 | 2 |
| 0.62 | 5.09E+01 | 6.79E+01 | 10 | 2 |
| 0.76 | 1.17E+02 | 1.45E+02 | 10 | 2 |
| 1.24 | 2.62E+02 | 2.90E+02 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.65 | 3.41E+02 | 3.63E+02 | 5 | 3 |
| 2.16 | 2.72E+02 | 2.83E+02 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.35 | 1.66E+02 | 1.69E+02 | 5 | 4 |
| 3.55 | 1.65E+02 | 1.69E+02 | 5 | 5 |
| 4.49 | 1.73E+02 | 1.76E+02 | 5 | 5 |
| 4.60 | 1.54E+02 | 1.57E+02 | 5 | 4 |
| 5.73 | 1.90E+02 | 1.93E+02 | 5 | 5 |
| 7.87 | 3.66E+02 | 3.72E+02 | 5 | 5 |
| 11.56 | 4.42E+02 | 4.44E+02 | 5 | 4 |
| 22.09 | 1.54E+03 | 1.55E+03 | 5 | 4 |
| 23.67 | 1.24E+03 | 1.24E+03 | 10 | 5 |
| 70.00 | 1.73E+03 | 1.73E+03 | 5 | 6 |
| 160.00 | 1.09E+03 | 1.09E+03 | 5 | 6 |
| 250.00 | 3.48E+02 | 3.48E+02 | 5 | 6 |
| 363.00 | 1.59E+02 | 1.59E+02 | 5 | 6 |
| 517.00 | 7.41E+01 | 7.41E+01 | 15 | 6 |
| 870.00 | <2.40E+01a | <2.40E+01a | ... | 6 |
Notes. The columns list the effective wavelength of each filter, the observed flux, the de-reddened flux, and the associated errors. Extinction uncertainties dominate at wavelengths shorter than 1μm, while calibration uncertainties dominate at longer wavelengths. Photometry references: 1) Bianchi et al. (2011); 2) Henden et al. (2016); 3) Cutri et al. (2003); 4) Cutri et al. (2014); 5) Evans et al. (2009); 6) this work.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.