Table 6.
Comparison of the Bayesian evidence for the three models: the constant model is independent of heliocentric latitude; the linear model is linear in heliocentric latitude; and the linear cos model is linear in the cosine of heliocentric latitude.
| Wavelength | ln[Zlinear cos/Zconstant] | ln[Zlinear cos/Zlinear] |
|---|---|---|
| Version 1 | (bakeouts corrected over whole mission lifetime) | |
| 171 Å | 19.01±0.07 | 4.06±0.09 |
| 195 Å | 73.81±0.07 | 6.53±0.09 |
| 284 Å | 181.40±0.07 | 48.02±0.09 |
| 304 Å | 80.92±0.08 | 6.69±0.09 |
| Version 2 | (bakeouts corrected from November 12, 2008, onward) | |
| 171 Å | 35388580±40 | 2779730±30 |
| 195 Å | 74364900±60 | 4646920±70 |
| 284 Å | 15234477±9 | 1759480±10 |
| 304 Å | 22603850±20 | −366600±20 |
Notes. We present the logarithm of the evidence ratios of the “linear cos” model to the other two; when this number is positive, as it is in most cases here, it means that the linear cos model is preferred. In every case, the linear cos model is preferred to the constant model. In every case except the version (2) 304 Å light curve, the linear cos model is also preferred to the linear model. The uncertainties are the statistical uncertainties reported by dynesty.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.