Open Access

Table A.1

The sample of this work.

Target Disk type d SpT M* L* log Lacc logM˙acc$\log \dot{\mathrm{M}}_{\text {acc}}$ log LX inc Ref.
[pc] [M] [L] [L] [M yr−1] [L] [deg]
BPTau Full 127.4 M0.5 0.48 0.37 ± 0.20 −1.34 ± 0.16 −8.25 ± 0.4 −3.45 ± 0.30 38.2 1,1,1,3
CIDA9 TD 175.1 M1.8 0.66 0.21 ± 0.20 −1.59 ± 0.20 −8.74 ± 0.4 45.6 2,2,2
DLTau Full 159.9 K5.5 0.90 0.40 ± 0.20 −0.35 ± 0.18 −7.62 ± 0.4 45.0 1,1,1
DNTau Full 128.6 M0.3 0.55 0.49 ± 0.20 −2.10 ± 0.42 −9.04 ± 0.4 −3.52 ± 0.30 35.2 1,1,1,3
DOTau Full 138.5 M0.3 0.42 0.37 ± 0.20 −0.93 ± 0.25 −7.80 ± 0.4 −4.21 ± 0.30 27.6 1,1,1,5
DRTau Full 193.0 K6 0.89 0.29 ± 0.20 −0.57 ± 0.31 −7.93 ± 0.4 −3.94 ± 0.30 5.4 1,1,1,6
DSTau Full 158.4 M0.4 0.61 0.29 ± 0.20 −1.46 ± 0.18 −8.57 ± 0.4 65.2 1,1,1
FTTau Full 130.2 M2.8 0.25 0.05 ± 0.20 −1.93 ± 0.21 −8.92 ± 0.4 −4.64 ± 0.30 35.5 1,1,1,6
GITau TD 129.4 M0.4 0.55 0.27 ± 0.20 −1.37 ± 0.20 −8.43 ± 0.4 −3.82 ± 0.30 43.8 1,1,1,5
GKTau Full 129.1 K7.5 1.20 0.87 ± 0.20 −1.39 ± 0.17 −8.67 ± 0.4 −3.42 ± 0.30 40.2 1,1,1,3
GOTau Full 142.4 M2.3 0.42 0.20 ± 0.20 −2.00 ± 0.20 −8.92 ± 0.4 −4.19 ± 0.30 53.9 3,3,3,3
HOTau Full 164.5 M3.2 0.5 0.16 ± 0.20 −2.00 ± 0.20 −9.13 ± 0.4 55.0 4,4,4
HQTau Full 161.4 K2.0 2.00 5.83 ± 0.20 −1.24 ± 0.17 −8.43 ± 0.4 −2.86 ± 0.30 53.8 1,1,1,3
IPTau TD 129.4 M0.6 0.51 0.31 ± 0.20 −2.16 ± 0.28 −9.14 ± 0.4 45.2 1,1,1
IQTau Full 131.5 M1.1 0.55 0.19 ± 0.20 −1.40 ± 0.26 −8.54 ± 0.4 −3.94 ± 0.30 62.1 1,1,1,6
MWC480 Full 156.2 A4.5 1.71 10.79 ± 0.20 −0.19 ± 0.27 −7.64 ± 0.4 −3.82 ± 0.30 36.5 1,1,1,6
UZTauE Full 1231.1 M1.9 0.41 0.45 ± 0.20 −1.27 ± 0.25 −8.05 ± 0.4 −4.40 ± 0.30 56.1 1,1,1,6
V409Tau Full 129.7 M0.6 0.43 0.24 ± 0.20 −2.64 ± 0.19 −9.58 ± 0.4 69.3 1,1,1
V836Tau Full 167.0 M0.8 0.28 0.63 ± 0.20 −1.93 ± 0.20 −8.37 ± 0.4 −3.19 ± 0.30 43.1 1,1,1,5
TW Hya Full 59.5 M0.0 0.6 0.3 ± 0.20 −1.35 ± 0.25 −8.65 ± 0.22 5. 9,11,11
HD163296 Full 101.2 A0 1.9 16.0 ± 0.20 0.73 ± 0.16 −6.79 ± 0.15 5. 12,8,8
AB Aur TD 163 A0 2.2 1.610.21+0.19$1.61_{-0.21}^{+0.19}$ 1.320.15+0.14$1.32_{-0.15}^{+0.14}$ 6.130.27+0.25$-6.13_{-0.27}^{+0.25}$ −3.70 ± 0.30 23 7,8,8,6
GGTau AA/Ab TD 149 K7 0.7 0.20 ± 0.20 0.024 ± 0.25 −7.3 ± 0.5 −3.94 ± 0.30 36 9,..†,9,6
HD100453 TD 104 A9 1.5 0.850.09+0.08$0.85_{-0.09}^{+0.08}$ 0.350.32+0.28$-0.35_{-0.32}^{+0.28}$ 7.790.33+0.29$-7.79_{-0.33}^{+0.29}$ 30 8,8,8
HD100546 TD 110 B9 2.2 1.450.11+0.11$1.45_{-0.11}^{+0.11}$ 0.97 ± 0.14 6.590.15+0.15$-6.59_{-0.15}^{+0.15}$ −4.36 ± 0.30 42 8,8,8,6
HD135344B TD 136 F5 1.6 0.940.14+0.13$0.94_{-0.14}^{+0.13}$ 0.090.22+0.21$0.09_{-0.22}^{+0.21}$ 7.250.21+0.21$-7.25_{-0.21}^{+0.21}$ 12 8,8,8,6
HD142527 TD 157 F6 2.3 1.390.10+0.09$1.39_{-0.10}^{+0.09}$ 0.650.19+0.18$0.65_{-0.19}^{+0.18}$ 6.61+0.18+0.15$-6.61_{+0.18}^{+0.15}$ −3.98 ± 0.30 27 8,8,8,6
HD169142 TD 114 A5 2 1.310.22+0.12$1.31_{-0.22}^{+0.12}$ 0.59 ± 0.15 7.09020+0.26$-7.09_{-020}^{+0.26}$ −4.68 ± 0.30 12 7,8,8,6
MWC758 TD 160 A7 1.6 1.040.08+0.12$1.04_{-0.08}^{+0.12}$ 0.410.18+0.17$0.41_{-0.18}^{+0.17}$ 7.000.22+0.24$-7.00_{-0.22}^{+0.24}$ −4.40 ± 0.09 21 7,8,8,10
SR24S TD 114 K1 1.5 0.40 ± 0.20 0.10 ± 0.25 −7.15 ± 0.5 46 9,..,9
TCha TD 110 K0 1.2 0.11 ± 0.20 0.012 ± 0.25 −8.4 ± 0.5 −3.11 ± 0.30 73 9,.., 9,6

Notes. Columns show the disk type, the distance (d), the spectral type (SpT), the stellar mass (M*) and luminosity (L*), the accretion luminosity (Lacc) and the accretion rate onto the central star (M˙acc$\dot{\mathrm{M}}_{\text {acc}}$), the X-ray luminosity, and the outer disk inclination (inc.). The last column reports the references for the stellar luminosity, the accretion luminosity, the accretion rates, and the X-ray luminosity. Distances are from Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration 2018). The inclinations of the outer disks are from Francis & van der Marel 2020 and Long et al. (2019). The uncertainty on the stellar luminosity is assumed to be 0.20 dex, based on the typical uncertainty estimated by Wichittanakom et al. (2020). The accretion luminosity on these targets is calculated starting from the reported accretion rate and using equation (2) in Wichittanakom et al. (2020), with uncertainties assumed to be 0.25 dex (Manara et al. 2023). X-ray luminosities are derived by correcting the fluxes reported in Table 4 in Dionatos et al. 2019 for the distance of each target and assuming a 0.30 dex uncertainty (Güdel et al. 2007). References: 1) Gangi et al. (2022), 2) Harsono et al. (2024), 3) Simon et al. (2016), 4) Ricci et al. (2010), 5) Pascucci et al. (2020) 6) Dionatos et al. 2019, 7) Vioque et al. 2018, 8) Wichittanakom et al. 2020, 9) Francis & van der Marel 2020, 10) Ryspaeva et al. 2023, 11) Herczeg et al. 2023, 12) Varga et al. 2021.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.