Open Access

Table 6

Comparison of estimated temperature (T) and column density (N) values for blue and red clump species using two methods: the traditional RD method and the χ2 fitting method.

Species Source Estimated temperature T (K) Estimated column density N (cm−2) Method
Blue clump
C2H2 (even, Para) Nickerson et al. (2023) 145 ± 9 (1.23 ± 0.15) × 1016 RD
This work 1613+3$161^{+3}_{-3}$ (0.984 ± 0.019) × 1016 χ2
C2H2 (odd, Ortho) Nickerson et al. (2023) 175 ± 12 (1.50 ± 0.15) × 1016 RD
This work 1923+3$192^{+3}_{-3}$ (1.31 ± 0.015) × 1016 χ2
13CCH2 Nickerson et al. (2023) 91 ± 9 (2.56 ± 0.18) × 1015 RD
This work 87.210.5+12.2$87.2^{+12.2}_{-10.5}$ (2.450.19+0.20)×1015$(2.45^{+0.20}_{-0.19}) \times 10^{15}$ χ2
Red clump
C2H2 (even, Para) Nickerson et al. (2023) 158 ± 16 (3.09 ± 0.57) × 1015 RD
This work 17010+11$170^{+11}_{-10}$ (2.430.18+0.18)×1015$(2.43^{+0.18}_{-0.18}) \times 10^{15}$ χ2
C2H2 (odd, Ortho) Nickerson et al. (2023) 229 ± 27 (3.58 ± 0.71) × 1015 RD
This work 27019+21$270^{+21}_{-19}$ (2.650.16+0.17)×1015$(2.65^{+0.17}_{-0.16}) \times 10^{15}$ χ2
13CCH2 Nickerson et al. (2023) 64 ± 6 (6.74 ± 0.64) × 1014 RD
This work 64.423.4+70.7$64.4^{+70.7}_{-23.4}$ (6.691.66+1.98)×1014$(6.69^{+1.98}_{-1.66}) \times 10^{14}$ χ2

Notes. The χ2 method significantly reduces error bars for C2H2 in the blue clump, while revealing larger uncertainties for 13CCH2 in the red clump due to sparse observational data. References: Nickerson et al. (2023).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.