Table 6
Comparison of estimated temperature (T) and column density (N) values for blue and red clump species using two methods: the traditional RD method and the χ2 fitting method.
| Species | Source | Estimated temperature T (K) | Estimated column density N (cm−2) | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue clump | ||||
| C2H2 (even, Para) | Nickerson et al. (2023) | 145 ± 9 | (1.23 ± 0.15) × 1016 | RD |
| This work | ![]() |
(0.984 ± 0.019) × 1016 | χ2 | |
| C2H2 (odd, Ortho) | Nickerson et al. (2023) | 175 ± 12 | (1.50 ± 0.15) × 1016 | RD |
| This work | ![]() |
(1.31 ± 0.015) × 1016 | χ2 | |
| 13CCH2 | Nickerson et al. (2023) | 91 ± 9 | (2.56 ± 0.18) × 1015 | RD |
| This work | ![]() |
![]() |
χ2 | |
| Red clump | ||||
| C2H2 (even, Para) | Nickerson et al. (2023) | 158 ± 16 | (3.09 ± 0.57) × 1015 | RD |
| This work | ![]() |
![]() |
χ2 | |
| C2H2 (odd, Ortho) | Nickerson et al. (2023) | 229 ± 27 | (3.58 ± 0.71) × 1015 | RD |
| This work | ![]() |
![]() |
χ2 | |
| 13CCH2 | Nickerson et al. (2023) | 64 ± 6 | (6.74 ± 0.64) × 1014 | RD |
| This work | ![]() |
![]() |
χ2 | |
Notes. The χ2 method significantly reduces error bars for C2H2 in the blue clump, while revealing larger uncertainties for 13CCH2 in the red clump due to sparse observational data. References: Nickerson et al. (2023).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.









