Comparison between DBNets2.0 and literature estimates for the masses of the proposed planets in the 49 observed substructures analysed. The left-hand panel shows a comparison with Lodato et al. (2019), who assumed the gap width to scale with the planet's Hill radius. The right-hand panel presents a comparison with the estimates from the previous version of our tool, DBNets (Ruzza et al. 2024). The colour map indicates the resolution of the considered observations, measured as the beam size over the assumed planet location. The diverging colour scale is centred on the resolution used by Ruzza et al. (2024) for both training and testing. Yellow crosses mark DBNets estimates that were considered unreliable by Ruzza et al. (2024), based on their rejection criterion.