Open Access

Fig. 4.

image

Download original image

SFR vs. L [ CII ] $ \rm L{\prime}_{[CII]} $ for the samples of Cormier et al. (2015) (green triangles), Olsen et al. (2017) (orange triangles), Bothwell et al. (2017) (black squares), and Glazer et al. (2024) and references therein (red symbols and teal stars). The red solid line represents the best fit for the listed sample based on a Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, and the thick black dashed line represents the Bayesian fitting. The gray, black, and blue dashed lines represent different best-fitting relations presented by Herrera-Camus et al. (2015), Pineda et al. (2014), and Sutter et al. (2019), respectively. In addition, we plot with solid black, blue, and green lines the De Looze et al. (2014) Dwarf Galaxy Survey (DGS), and the normal and high star formation efficiency relations by Herrera-Camus et al. (2018) (HC+ 2018), respectively. The relation given in Bisbas et al. (2022) is presented as a dashed magenta line. Finally, the relation that best fits the simulated data presented by Olsen et al. (2017) is included in the figure with a dash-dotted yellow line.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.