Table 2.
Spectral fit results for the eROSITA and Swift/XRT observations of J012026.
| Epoch | Spectrum | Best model | kT [eV] | Γ | [erg s−1 cm−2] |
[erg s−1 cm−2] |
Δlog Z |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eRASS2 | Full | power-law | 90 ± 10 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 |
| eRASS3 | Full | – | ![]() |
4.79 ± 0.64 | ![]() |
![]() |
0 |
| Baseline | – | 80 ± 10 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0 | |
| Flare | power-law | 90 ± 10 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | |
| Swift/XRT3 | Full | power-law | ![]() |
3.66 ± 0.31 | ![]() |
2.3 ± 0.5 × 10−12 | 0 |
| Swift/XRT4 | Full | power-law | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 |
| eRASS4 | Full | – | – | ![]() |
– | ![]() |
– |
| eRASS5 | Full | – | 100 ± 10 | ![]() |
(8.1 ± 1.1)×10−13 | ![]() |
0 |
| Baseline | – | 70 ± 10 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0 | |
| Flare | – | 120 ± 20 | 3.97 ± 0.48 | ![]() |
![]() |
0 | |
Notes. In the second column, we indicate whether the results correspond to the full spectrum, the flaring eROdays only, or the remaining baseline eROdays. Based on the difference in Bayesian evidence (last column), we indicate which of the two models is preferred in the third column. We report both the DISKBB temperature kT and the photon index Γ for all spectra in Cols. 4 and 5, as well as the 0.2–2.3 keV flux derived for each model respectively in Cols. 6 and 7.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.




























