Attempting an accurate age estimate of the open cluster NGC 6633 using CoRoT and Gaia

Open Access

Table A.1.

Information on giant members of NGC 6633

ID	HD 170053	HD 170174	HD 170231	HD 170292	TIC 319770092
Symbol in plots	cross	square	circle	triangle	diamond
Gaia DR3 ID	447746039-	447722337-	447727326-	447724911-	447725330-
	1998886144	8527434880	8868842752	3972647168	5860760960
2MASS ID ^(a)	18271429	18275474	18280018	18282297	18281763
	+0700329	+0636003	+0654514	+0642293	+0646000
RA (degrees)	276.809510	276.978078	277.000773	277.095725	277.073496
Dec (degrees)	7.009091	6.600086	6.914277	6.708119	6.766667
pmra (mas · yr⁻¹)	1.018	1.445	1.430	1.182	1.171
pmdec (mas · yr⁻¹)	-1.676	-1.947	-1.826	-1.546	-2.018
Gaia DR3 parallax (mas)	2.514(21)	2.511(22)	2.576(20)	2.539(20)	2.549(19)
ν_eff	1.4085894	1.4590598	1.4565996	1.4639846	1.4669659
ecl_lat (deg)	30.263	29.84	30.158	29.947	30.007
RUWE	0.962	0.958	1.013	0.879	1.035
Parallax corr. (mas)	-0.0329	-0.0328	-0.0326	-0.0325	-0.0324
v_broad (km s⁻¹)	9.60(51)	11.42(53)	9.90(43)	9.74(67)	10.74(100)
RV (km s⁻¹)	-29.27(13)	-28.71(13)	-28.45(13)	-29.02(14)	-28.68(16)
G (mag)	6.840	7.987	8.328	8.464	8.641
K_S (mag) ^(a)	4.087	5.674	6.065	6.246	6.443
G_BP − G_RP	1.567	1.295	1.293	1.259	1.242
E(B − V) Green ^(b)	0.088	0.159	0.150	0.133	0.150
E(B − V) Peña ^(c)	0.182	0.182	0.182	0.182	0.182
E(B − V) calc. (V − K_S) ^(d)	0.048	0.180	0.184	0.177	0.180
E(B − V) calc. (G_BP − G_RP) ^(d)	0.112	0.185	0.205	0.189	0.187

T_eff (K)Ts	-	4924	5015	5068	5093
T_eff (K)So	-	4979	-	5124	5163
T_eff (K)Ma	-	4957	5025	5056	-
T_eff (K)Mo	4290	5055	5175	-	-
T_eff (K)Ca	-	5010	5095	5135	5165
T_eff (K)Ad	4290	5050	5125	5160	5195
T_eff from G_BP − G_RP (K)e	4240	4953	4933	4970	5110
T_eff from G − K_S (K)e	4368	4987	5023	5029	5104
BC_G (mag)f	-0.2603	0.0045	0.0194	0.0259	0.0321
BC_{K_S} (mag)f	2.3773	1.8895	1.8447	1.8240	1.8033
L(L_⊙) from K_Sf	321.3(53)	122.4(21)	84.7(13)	75.0(12)	63.35(93)
R_SB(R_⊙)f	32.5(13)	14.46(48)	11.68(38)	10.85(35)	9.83(32)

[C/N]Mo	−0.61	−0.69	-	-	-
[C/N]GE	-	−0.68	−0.64	−0.63	-
A(Li) NLTEMoMaTs	1.44(12)	0.80(12)	1.49(12)	1.21*	1.42*
A(Li) LTE MoMa	1.20(12)	0.71(12)	1.33(12)	1.08*	-
A(Li) LTE Ts	-	0.56(8)	1.17(2)	0.99(4)	1.21(3)
A(Li) LTEMaMoTs	1.17*	0.66(5)	1.31(3)	1.05(3)	1.28*
A(Li) NLTEMaMoWaTs	0.97(12)*	0.61(12)	1.26(12)	1.00(12)	1.23(12)*

Notes.

^(a)

Skrutskie et al. (2006).

^(b)

From Bayestar2019 E(g − r), using the conversion factor 0.884 from Green et al. (2019), A_G = 2.74 × E(B − V) (Casagrande & VandenBerg 2018), A_{K_S} = 0.366 × E(B − V), A_{G_BP} = 3.374 × E(B − V) and A_{G_RP} = 2.035 × E(B − V) (Casagrande & VandenBerg 2014).

^(c)

Peña et al. (2017).

^(d)

Assuming adopted T_effs and requiring agreement with photometric temperatures from Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018). The one using V − K_S is adopted. TsTsantaki et al. (2023). SoSantos et al. (2009), values from "other linelist". MaMagrini et al. (2021). ^(Mo)Morel et al. (2014), Lagarde et al. (2015). ^(Ca)Casamiquela et al. (2021), numbers provided by L. Casamiquela (private comm.) ^(Ad)Adopted T_effs. See text. ^(e)Calculated using Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018) assuming E(B − V) from Green et al. (2019). [Fe/H] = + 0.0 and log g = 2.7 was assumed. A change of ±0.1 dex in [Fe/H] corresponds to ∓8 K, a change of ±0.5 in log g yields ∓2 K fAssuming the adopted T_effs, corresponding E(B − V)s, Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018), and Gaia Parallaxes. ^(GE)Randich et al. (2022), Casali et al. (2019) ^(MoLaMaA)(Li) LTE from the online Table A5 of Morel et al. (2014). For the measurements marked with a *, the abundance was calculated using the numbers from Magrini et al. (2021) and the mean difference for the stars in common. ^(MoMaTsA)(Li) NLTE from Table A5 of Morel et al. (2014) who used NLTE corrections from Lind et al. (2009). For the measurements marked with a *, the abundance was calculated using the numbers of Magrini et al. (2021) or Tsantaki et al. (2023) and the mean difference for the stars in common. ^(MaMoTsA)(Li) LTE from Magrini et al. (2021). For the measurements marked with a *, the abundance was calculated using the numbers of Morel et al. (2014), Lagarde et al. (2015) or Tsantaki et al. (2023) and the mean difference for the stars in common. ^(Ts)A(Li) LTE from Tsantaki et al. (2023)MaMoWaTsA(Li) 3D NLTE caluclated from Magrini et al. (2021) LTE values using 3D NLTE corrections from Wang et al. (2021). For the measurements marked with a *, the 3D NLTE correction was applied to the LTE value of Morel et al. (2014), Lagarde et al. (2015) or Tsantaki et al. (2023) corrected to Magrini et al. (2021) using the mean difference for the stars in common. We adopt the larger of the error-bars from Morel et al. (2014) that includes systematic errors.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.