Table 3.
The difference between eFEDS-DOGs and eFEDS-undetected DOGs: physical parameters, geometry, and population.
| Physical parameter | Explanation | Expression | Geometry | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Figure 11 | (A) | (B) | ||
| NH | Gas absorption | Cyan arrow | High | Low |
| A(i) | Dust absorption | Orange arrow | High | High |
| W4 flux | Dust re-emission | Dust covering factor | High | High |
| (i − W4)AB | Color | High | High | |
| Population | eFEDS-undetected DOGs | eFEDS-DOGs | ||
Notes. The table summarizes the classification of eFEDS-DOGs based on key physical parameters and their corresponding expressions in Figure 11. The “geometry” column indicates the prevalence of high or low values for gas absorption, dust absorption, dust re-emission, and color. The “population” row distinguishes between eFEDS-undetected DOGs and eFEDS-DOGs. The text and color in the “expression” column represent the following: a cyan arrow indicating gas-absorbed flux, an orange arrow indicating dust-absorbed flux, and a filled gray circle distribution representing the dust covering factor.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.