Notes. The estimated absolute uncertainties for the column densities are 10%. The relative uncertainties for the column densities of the isotopologues of a given species are better than 5%, however, i.e. the relative calibration of the observed lines in the QUIJOTE line survey. ^(a)Underestimated by the opacity of the J=1–0 and 2–1 transitions of CS. A two-layer model is needed to explain the observed intensities (see Section 4.1). ^(b)A small opacity effect in the J=2–1 line of C³⁴S may exist (see text). ^(c)The lines of ¹³C³³S are weak. The column density was derived from the intensities of the two hyperfine components of the J=1–0 transition, which are detected above 5σ (see Fig. 3). ^(d)Kinetic temperatures estimated from HC³⁴S⁺ adopting the same value of T_K for all hyperfine components of HC³³S⁺ (see Section 4.2). ^(e)Column density from Cabezas et al. (2022b). ^(f)The rotational temperatures were assumed to be identical to those of CC³⁴S (see text). ^(g)Derived adopting a rotational temperature of 8 K and an ortho/para ratio identical to that estimated for the other isotopologues of H₂CS (see text). ^(h)Very uncertain determination of n(H₂). A similar column density is obtained assuming an uniform rotational temperature of 8 K (see Appendix A.7). ⁽ⁱ⁾A similar column density is obtained assuming a uniform kinetic temperature of 8.5 K (see Appendix A.8).