Open Access

Table 1

Overview of the sample.

Target name SpT Distance (pc) vrad (km s−1) Group Teff (K) L* (L) M* (M) Age (Myr) Mult. Ref. Label
HD 9985 A2 158.21.0+1.0$\[158.2_{-1.0}^{+1.0}\]$ +10.2±3.7 . . . 8900±200 14.18±0.61 1.88±0.04 4416+31$\[44_{-16}^{+31}\]$ . . . 3 1
HD 31305 A3 142.62.7+2.6$\[142.6_{-2.7}^{+2.6}\]$ −2.1±3.3 TAU 8600±170 16.95±0.64 1.970.07+0.06$\[1.97_{-0.07}^{+0.06}\]$ 2.51.5+3.8$\[2.5_{-1.5}^{+3.8}\]$ Y 1 . . .
HD 112532 A2 119.50.4+0.4$\[119.5_{-0.4}^{+0.4}\]$ +12.4±4.4 LCC 8850±200 13.87±0.62 1.87±0.04 15±3 . . . 2 2
HD 131960 F1 146.60.5+0.5$\[146.6_{-0.5}^{+0.5}\]$ +2.58±1.47 UCL 7000±150 4.22±0.18 1.41±0.04 16±2 . . . 2 . . .
HD 141960 A9 142.50.4+0.5$\[142.5_{-0.4}^{+0.5}\]$ +0.90±0.72 US 7400±130 6.46±0.23 1.57±0.04 10±3 . . . 2 3
HD 144277 A3 143.40.7+0.6$\[143.4_{-0.7}^{+0.6}\]$ +1.72±0.49 UCL 8550±170 11.83±0.47 1.80±0.05 16±2 Y 2 . . .
HD 145101 A6 137.70.9+0.8$\[137.7_{-0.9}^{+0.8}\]$ −5.07±0.35 US 7950±200 18.58±0.68 1.890.05+0.14$\[1.89_{-0.05}^{+0.14}\]$ 6.7±0.5 . . . 2 4
HD 152989 A6 114.90.5+0.4$\[114.9_{-0.5}^{+0.4}\]$ −7.49±0.80 UCL 7950±150 7.21±0.22 1.590.03+0.02$\[1.59_{-0.03}^{+0.02}\]$ 16±2 Y 4 5
HD 155853 A4 136.10.6+0.7$\[136.1_{-0.6}^{+0.7}\]$ +0.39±1.51 UCL 8250±150 11.24±0.41 1.790.04+0.03$\[1.79_{-0.04}^{+0.03}\]$ 16±2 . . . 2 6
HD 159595 A3 93.00.2+0.3$\[93.0_{-0.2}^{+0.3}\]$ −9.08±0.65 BPMG? 8450±140 10.58±0.35 1.75±0.03 215+4$\[21_{-5}^{+4}\]$ . . . 2 7
HD 170116 A4 187.80.8+0.8$\[187.8_{-0.8}^{+0.8}\]$ −17.83±1.33 . . . 8250±250 11.63±0.60 1.79±0.04 317+9$\[31_{-7}^{+9}\]$ . . . 3 8
HD 176497 A4 153.30.6+0.6$\[153.3_{-0.6}^{+0.6}\]$ −5.14±1.64 UCRA 8200±170 8.90±0.37 1.68±0.03 10 . . . 2 9

Notes. Distance estimates are from Bailer-Jones et al. (2021) using their geometric approach that is based only on the Gaia EDR3 parallaxes. Where available, the listed heliocentric radial velocity (vrad) data were taken from the Gaia DR3 catalogue. For HD 9985 the quoted vrad is from Gontcharov (2006), while for HD 31305 and HD 112532 we list the optimal radial velocities provided by the BANYAN Σ tool (Gagné et al. 2018), assuming that the star is indeed a member of the stellar association determined from astrometric data alone (Appendix A.3). For a more detailed description of how the listed stellar properties (Teff, L*, M*, group membership, age, and multiplicity) were determined, see Appendix A. Abbreviations in the group column are as follows – COL: Columba moving group; LCC: Lower Centaurus Crux association; TAU: Taurus; UCRA: Upper CrA; UCL: Upper Centaurus Lupus association; US: Upper Scorpius association. Spectral type are derived from the obtained Teff estimates using the updated online table1 of stellar parameters compiled by Pecaut & Mamajek (2013). The listed references show those studies in which the infrared excess of the stars was first reported: (1) Clark (1991); (2) Cotten & Song (2016); (3) McDonald et al. (2012); (4) this work. The last column shows which label we use to mark the given object in Figs. 79.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.