Open Access

Table 5

Fourier and photodynamical mass estimates.

Parameter Units Median and 68.3% CI MAP vR/vS, AS (1) Petigura(2) From Radii(3)
Photodyn Photodyn Fourier Photodyn
10 yr 10 yr 10 yr 3.3 yr
mb M 30.8 ± 1.3 29.62 30.03 32.4 ± 1.7 39.6
mc M 11.12 ± 0.44 10.94 11.08 10.8 ± 0.6 18.0
Δmb,c/mb,c −0.04, −0.02 −0.02, −0.004 +0.05, +0.03 +0.29, +0.62
ρb g cm−3 0.59 0.57 0.58 0.52 0.76
ρc g cm−3 1.05 1.03 1.04 0.86 1.69
PS(P¯S)${P_S}\,\left( {{{\bar P}_S}} \right)$ d 2711.2 (2751.9)
PR d 717.4
AS(b),AR(b)$A_S^{\left( b \right)},\,A_R^{\left( b \right)}$ min 53.4, (41.7)
AS(c),AR(c)$A_S^{\left( c \right)},\,A_R^{\left( c \right)}$ min 233.2, (148.3)
βS, βR deg [ 101.9 ]1.4+.1.5[ 42.7 ]1.9+.2.2$\matrix{ {\left[ { - 101.9} \right]_{ - 1.4}^{ + .1.5}} & {\left[ { - 42.7} \right]_{ - 1.9}^{ + .2.2}} \cr } $ [−103.9], [−41.9] (−103.5, −35.7)
λn deg 85.81.9+1.7$85.8_{ - 1.9}^{ + 1.7}$ 82.8 37.5(4)
R [ 14.81 ]0.26+0.37$\left[ {14.81} \right]_{ - 0.26}^{ + 0.37}$ [15.49] 13.28 [15.7]
σ [ 0.0029 ]2.e5+1.e5$\left[ {0.0029} \right]_{ - 2.e - 5}^{ + 1.e - 5}$ [0.0029] 0.0030 [0.0029]
eb(+)(eb)$e_b^{\left( + \right)}\left( {{e_b}} \right)$ [ 0.015 ]0.0002+0.0002(0.0430.024+0.024)$\left[ {0.015} \right]_{ - 0.0002}^{ + 0.0002}\left( {0.043_{ - 0.024}^{ + 0.024}} \right)$ [0.015] (0.069) 0.015 [ 0.015 ](0.200.03+0.03)$\left[ {0.015} \right]\left( {0.20_{ - 0.03}^{ + 0.03}} \right)$
ec(+)(ec)$e_c^{\left( + \right)}\left( {{e_c}} \right)$ [ 0.044 ]0.0004+0.0005(0.0670.017+0.017)$\left[ {0.044} \right]_{ - 0.0004}^{ + 0.0005}\left( {0.067_{ - 0.017}^{ + 0.017}} \right)$ [0.045] (0.078) 0.043 [ 0.047 ](0.210.03+0.03)$\left[ {0.047} \right]\left( {0.21_{ - 0.03}^{ + 0.03}} \right)$

Notes. (1): νR/νS, AS / Fourier A uses the frequency ratio and superamplitudes only to estimate masses; (2): Petigura / Photodyn uses system parameters from the photodynamical analysis of Petigura et al. (2020); (3): Estimates using mass-radius relation mp/ME = (Rp/0.56 RE)1/0.67 (Müller et al. 2024); (4): Petigura et al. (2020) value minus 180° to account for the fact that the authors assumed Ωb(tref) = 0; [Square brackets] show the quantity calculated analytically from elements and masses using the formalism of Mardling (2025a); ∆mb,c/mb,c = relative difference in masses compared to median value; P¯S${\bar P_S}$ (defined from ephemeris periods such that P¯S1=nP¯b1(n+1)P¯c1$\bar P_S^{ - 1} = n\bar P_b^{ - 1} - \left( {n + 1} \right)\bar P_c^{ - 1}$) listed in the last column for comparison with the Fourier superperiod; Boldface entries: highlighted for comparison; Amplitudes and phases in brackets were not used directly in mass estimates. Last two rows: Entries in brackets are the median and 68.3% CI eccentricities for comparison with the fixed-point values eb(+)$e_b^{\left( + \right)}$ and eb(+)$e_b^{\left( + \right)}$. The reference mean densities are ρSaturn = 0.69 g cm−3, ρUranus = 1.15 g cm−3.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.