Open Access

Table 1

Comparison of the calculated PD and PGL between three methods.

No. of actuators Performance indices POSM AIMSR SP Difference between the SP method and the average of the values obtained from AIMSR and POSM
10 φp (°) 208 208 208.36 0.36
θp (arcsec) 0.1843 0.1908 0.1942 0.00665
PGL (dB) 0.5906 0.6089 0.5640 −0.03575

20 φp (°) 147 148 147.70 0.2
θp (arcsec) 0.5299 0.5652 0.5469 −0.00065
PGL (dB) 0.5437 0.5676 0.5868 0.03115

40 φp (°) 32 32 32.57 0.57
θp (arcsec) 0.2650 0.2700 0.2535 −0.014
PGL (dB) 0.5429 0.5406 0.5464 0.00465

60 φp (°) 69 69 70.81 1.81
θp (arcsec) 0.1382 0.1476 0.1428 −1e–4
PGL (dB) 0.6354 0.6373 0.6723 0.03595

80 φp (°) 322 322 322.33 0.33
θp (arcsec) 0.2419 0.2664 0.2563 0.00215
PGL (dB) 0.6307 0.6274 0.6542 0.02515

99 φp (°) 223 223 223.71 0.71
θp (arcsec) 0.2938 0.2988 0.2857 −0.0106
PGL (dB) 0.5718 0.5964 0.5372 −0.0469

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.