Table 3.
Model fit and test results for SN Ia data.
| Parameter/Statistic | AvERA-135k | AvERA-320k | AvERA-625k | AvERA-1080k | Flat ΛCDM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H0 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| MB | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| α | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| β | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| γ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Ωm, 0 | 0.332* | 0.299* | 0.279* | 0.266* | ![]() |
| χ2 | 1539 | 1543 | 1547 | 1551 | 1521 |
| log10ℬ (NS) | 2.775 | 3.649 | 4.603 | 5.495 | 0 |
| log10ℬ (AD) | 0.223 | 0.148 | 0.074 | 0 (2.782) | 0.761 |
Notes. Best-fit parameter values and model comparison statistics for the SN dataset. H0 is given in kilometers per second per megaparsec. Simulated values of Ωm, 0 values for the AvERA models (marked with asterisk) are also included for reference. The χ2 values were computed using the best-fit parameters. Bayes factors are shown for both the nested sampling evidence [log10ℬ (NS)] and the AD test [log10ℬ (AD)], as is defined in the main text in Section 2. While none of the models satisfy the AD test’s p ≥ 0.05 criterion, the test favors the AvERA-1080k model (with
) and indicates a clear preference for the AvERA model over the flat ΛCDM model. This contrasts with the nested sampling Bayes factors, which strongly favor the flat ΛCDM model. The discrepancy is due to the flat ΛCDM model overfitting the SN data (see Section 3 for a detailed discussion).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

























