Table 2.
Comparison of the negative convective flux region in the models and simulations.
| Model | Max/(104 cm3/K/s3) | Min/(104 cm3/K/s3) | Ratio | rmax/(1010 cm) | rmin/(1010 cm) | Δr/(1010 cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-equation | 8.921 | −0.808 | −0.091 | 2.115 | 2.210 | 0.095 |
| 3-equation | 9.004 | −0.064 | −0.007 | 2.066 | 2.099 | 0.033 |
| MLT | 9.028 | 0 | 0 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| sim_k | 7.571 | −0.494 | −0.065 | 1.803 | 1.909 | 0.106 |
| sim_m | 8.864 | −0.406 | −0.046 | 2.034 | 2.034 | 0 |
Notes. Comparison of the negative convective flux region in the models and simulations. The second and third column show the maximum and minimum value of Π for the different models given in column one. The last column gives the ratio of column three and two. The radial extent of the negative convective flux excursion for the models and simulations is given in the fourth column. The fifth and sixth column give the minimum and maximum radius of the half maximum, respectively. The last column gives the full width at half maximum. Note that for the sim_m simulation the radial extent is smaller than 10−3.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.