Table 2
Comparisons of relative mineral abundances of the CE5 samples and landing site retrieved from different sources.
| OLV (wt.%) | OPX (wt.%) | CPX (wt.%) | PLG (wt.%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMS | 14.73 | 10.15 | 25.21 | 49.92 | |
| This work | FTIR | 14.03 | 4.68 | 28.05 | 53.25 |
| MI | 13.77 | 10.25 | 36.05 | 39.92 | |
| Cao et al. (2022) | 14.74 | 3.21 | 39.20 | 42.84 | |
| Li et al. (2022) | 7.33 | 53.98 | 38.69 | ||
| Lin et al. (2022) | 26.41 | 46.57 | 27.02 |
Notes. Mineral abundances are in wt.% (densities: olivine 3.3, pyroxene 3.2, feldspar 2.7 g/cm3); typical uncertainties are 8 wt.% for the LUT, LMS, FTIR, and Kaguya MI data, and 10 wt.% for spectral unmixing (Lin et al. 2022); errors not reported in Li et al. (2022) and Cao et al. (2022).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.