Open Access

Table B.1.

Star cluster magnifications in different lens models.

ID glafic Lenstool Ratio
A.1 47 . 9 4.0 + 4.0 $ 47.9^{+4.0}_{-4.0} $ 67 . 7 0.3 + 9.1 $ 67.7^{+9.1}_{-0.3} $ 1 . 4 0.1 + 0.2 $ 1.4^{+0.2}_{-0.1} $
B.1 92 . 3 10.6 + 11.7 $ 92.3^{+11.7}_{-10.6} $ 125 . 4 3.2 + 23.2 $ 125.4^{+23.2}_{-3.2} $ 1 . 4 0.2 + 0.3 $ 1.4^{+0.3}_{-0.2} $
C.1 124 . 5 16.8 + 19.7 $ 124.5^{+19.7}_{-16.8} $ 160 . 6 6.7 + 35.1 $ 160.6^{+35.1}_{-6.7} $ 1 . 3 0.2 + 0.3 $ 1.3^{+0.3}_{-0.2} $
D.1 166 . 6 26.5 + 31.7 $ 166.6^{+31.7}_{-26.5} $ 216 . 3 13.4 + 61.8 $ 216.3^{+61.8}_{-13.4} $ 1 . 3 0.3 + 0.4 $ 1.3^{+0.4}_{-0.3} $
E.1 323 . 5 82.4 + 125.5 $ 323.5^{+125.5}_{-82.4} $ 369 . 8 48.9 + 198.9 $ 369.8^{+198.9}_{-48.9} $ 1 . 1 0.5 + 0.7 $ 1.1^{+0.7}_{-0.5} $
v A.2 52 . 2 3.2 + 4.4 $ 52.2^{+4.4}_{-3.2} $ 74 . 1 3.1 + 8.0 $ 74.1^{+8.0}_{-3.1} $ 1 . 4 0.1 + 0.2 $ 1.4^{+0.2}_{-0.1} $
B.2 90 . 3 7.4 + 7.3 $ 90.3^{+7.3}_{-7.4} $ 131 . 6 10.2 + 18.3 $ 131.6^{+18.3}_{-10.2} $ 1 . 5 0.2 + 0.2 $ 1.5^{+0.2}_{-0.2} $
C.2+D.2 132 . 5 14.4 + 16.7 $ 132.5^{+16.7}_{-14.4} $ 200 . 6 22.8 + 40.6 $ 200.6^{+40.6}_{-22.8} $ 1 . 5 0.3 + 0.3 $ 1.5^{+0.3}_{-0.3} $

Notes. Shown is a comparison between the magnification values obtained for the five main clusters in the case of the two lens models studied (glafic and LENSTOOL). Their ratios, reported in the last column, represent the scaling factor used to convert the intrinsic masses, derived assuming one of the models, to the ones obtained by the other.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.