Notes. Columns: name of the object, type of curve used to fit the components of the line (Lorentzian - L, narrow Gaussian - G_n, broad Gaussian - G_b, core Gaussian - G_c, and outflow Gaussian - G_o), flux, FWHM of the line along with the uncertainty, old classification from Foschini et al. (2022) (F22), the new proposed classification, M_BH, R_Edd, the used methods, and measured redshift. The FWHM values marked with * correspond to those associated with the narrow lines, while values marked with @ correspond to FWHM totally dominated by the instrumental contribution. The table is divided horizontally into two sections: the Hβ–[O III]λ5007 section and the Mg IIλ2800–[O II]λ3727 section. The classifications highlighted in bold correspond to cases in which the new spectra were useful either to confirm the classification proposed by Foschini et al. (2022) or to propose a new one. Methods: (A) for Dalla Bontà et al. (2020), (B) for Ho & Kim (2014), and (C) for Trakhtenbrot & Netzer (2012). The same is valid for the Eddington ratio, due its dependence on M_BH. In this case the methods are: (D) for the classical derivation of R_Edd from Hβ, (E) for the derivation of R_Edd from [O III]λ5007, and (F) for the derivation of R_Edd from Mg IIλ2800.