Table 1.
Performance statistics for Zoobot and GALFIT.
| RMSE | RAE | ⟨ΔfAGN⟩ | Outlier (20%) | Outlier (30%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoobot | 0.013 ± 0.005 | 0.076 ± 0.005 | −0.0018 ± 0.0002 | 0.065 ± 0.004 | 0.061 ± 0.003 |
| ZoobotM | 0.014 ± 0.006 | 0.102 ± 0.009 | −0.0017 ± 0.0005 | 0.072 ± 0.010 | 0.065 ± 0.010 |
| ZoobotNM | 0.013 ± 0.006 | 0.073 ± 0.005 | −0.0018 ± 0.0002 | 0.065 ± 0.004 | 0.061 ± 0.004 |
| GALFIT (fhost from original image) | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | −0.018 ± 0.002 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| GALFITM (fhost from original image) | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | −0.024 ± 0.004 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
| GALFITNM (fhost from original image) | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | −0.016 ± 0.002 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| GALFIT (fhost from model) | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | −0.075 ± 0.003 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 |
| GALFITM (fhost from model) | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | −0.087 ± 0.007 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.04 |
| GALFITNM (fhost from model) | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | −0.073 ± 0.003 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.01 |
Notes. We summarise the overall performance from Zoobot and GALFIT (for both ways of calculating the AGN contribution fraction), in terms of the RMSE, RAE, mean difference, and outlier fractions (at different percentage levels, 20% and 30%). We show the results for the whole sample and mergers (M) and non-mergers (NM) separately.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.