Table 3.
Relevant merger rates and pair fractions in the literature.
| Structure | Type | ftype (%) | M*/Mag Range | Major? | Redshift Range | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSA22 | Merger | 48 ± 10 | 19.0 ≤RAB≤ 25.5 mag | No | z ≃ 3.1 | 1 |
| Field | Merger | 31 ± 5 | 19.0 ≤RAB≤ 25.5 mag | No | 2.5 ≤ z ≤ 3.5 | 1 |
| SSA22 | Merger | 38![]() |
RAB≤ 25.5 mag | No | z ≃ 3.1 | 2 |
| Field | Merger | 41![]() |
RAB≤ 25.5 mag | No | 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 3.3 | 2 |
| BOSS1244 | Pair | 22 ± 5 | log(M*/M⊙) > 10.3 | Yes | z≃ 2.24 | 3 |
| BOSS1542 | Pair | 33 ± 6 | log(M*/M⊙) > 10.3 | Yes | z≃ 2.24 | 3 |
| Field | Pair | 12 ± 2 | log(M*/M⊙) > 10.3 | Yes | 2.1 < z< 2.4 | 3 |
![]() |
Merger | 20 ± 0.4 | mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 2 | 4 |
![]() |
Merger | 20.6 ± 0.9 | mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 2 | 4 |
![]() |
Merger | 20 ± 1.5 | mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 3 | 4 |
![]() |
Merger | 24.6![]() |
mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 3 | 4 |
![]() |
Merger | 20 ± 0.5 | mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 4 − 5 | 4 |
![]() |
Merger | 27.7![]() |
mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 4 − 5 | 4 |
![]() |
Merger | 35.9![]() |
mUV < 23.5 | Yes | z ∼ 4 − 5 | 4 |
| Hyperion | CKC | ![]() |
9.3 ≲log(M*/M⊙) | Yes | 2.4 < z< 2.7 | This Work |
| Field | CKC | ![]() |
9.3 ≲log(M*/M⊙) | Yes | 2 < z < 2.4 & 2.7 < z < 3 | This Work |
Notes. All rates given are derived in similar fashions to our fckc metric and are for studies that measure rates for high-z structures at relevant redshift ranges to that of Hyperion (z ≳ 2). Though the assessment techniques and selection methods vary greatly for the limited studies currently available, merger and interaction activity is consistently found to be higher within more overdense regions and/or structures. For the fractions drawn from Shibuya et al. (2025), values are reported for different average levels of galaxy overdensity (δ) rather than at a field versus structure level. Based on our definition of structure (see Section 3.2.2), a δ ≳ 0.62 is the rough threshold we associate with potential structure. (1) Hine et al. (2016); (2) Monson et al. (2021); (3) Liu et al. (2023); (4) Shibuya et al. (2025).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.













