Table 3
Success rate of period calculations using the multi-band Lomb-Scargle method.
| Variable star type | 1 year | 2 years | 3 years | 5 years | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Cepheids | 31.3 | 68.7 | 23.1 | 76.9 | 16.9 | 83.1 | 14.4 | 85.6 |
| Delta Scuti stars | 87.0 | 13.0 | 67.7 | 32.3 | 61.9 | 38.1 | 53.1 | 46.9 |
| Eclipsing binaries | 91.0 | 9.0 | 66.0 | 34.0 | 62.0 | 38.0 | 54.0 | 46.0 |
| RR Lyrae stars | 69.0 | 31.0 | 34.8 | 65.2 | 28.1 | 71.9 | 15.7 | 84.3 |
| Type-II Cepheids | 43.3 | 56.7 | 22.2 | 77.8 | 18.3 | 81.7 | 14.1 | 85.9 |
Notes. Success rate (in percentage, rounded to 1 decimal place) of period calculations using the multiband Lomb–Scargle method with ZTF data. Similar to the previous calculation, we used different time windows. Only two filters (g and r) were present in the multi-band calculation, and they were compared to the OGLE-IV periods. We list unsuccessful calculations (red) and successful period calculations (teal).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.