Fig. 5
Download original image
Relative difference between the 2D SG prescriptions and the reference gravitational field (see Eq. (26)) for H = 0.4 AU. From left to right: (left panel) the sharp potential with ε/H = 0, (middle panel) the variable Bessel kernel, and (right panel) the soft potential with ε/H=1.2. The colours of the contour levels at 10−5, 10−3, 0.1, 0.5 are indicated in the colour bar. Softening prescriptions exhibit errors exceeding tens of percent at disc positions, whereas the Bessel prescription maintain errors below 3%.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.