Fig. A.1
Download original image
Comparison of 1D temperature profiles of the hydrostatic models at the end of the simulation for two different radiation methods — flux-limited diffusion (FLD, used in this work) and moment transfer (M1, Melon Fuksman & Klahr 2022). Overall we see very good agreement with temperatures with FLD and M1, with the optically thin atmosphere being captured quite well. The dotted black line shows the analytical solution for the temperature profile in the optically thin atmosphere (Chiang & Goldreich 1997). The midplane temperatures are also in good agreement, with some minor deviations. The M1 method shows higher amplitude bumps than the FLD method. We also include the RADMC-3D calculations corresponding to our FLD model, these correspond to the green lines.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.