Open Access

Table A.2.

Bayesian evidence for the models corresponding to the 12 positive detections.

Glitch tg (MJD) Δ ν ¨ p $ \Delta\ddot{\nu}_{\mathrm{p}} $ in Model 1 Δ ν ¨ p $ \Delta\ddot{\nu}_{\mathrm{p}} $ in Model 2 Evidence Model 1 Evidence Model 2 ln B21 Evidence criteria
1 51278(16) No No 318.96 355.63 16 Decisive
2 51562(15) Yes No 285.94 292.45 2.82 Moderate
6 51960(5) Yes Yes 248.69 265.81 7.48 Strong
12 52545(6) Yes No 340.81 352.68 5.16 Strong
38 55280(4) Yes No 161.71 181.80 8.72 Strong
43 55615(4) No No 141.72 164.92 10.07 Decisive
45 55819(2) No No 118.74 127.78 3.92 Moderate
47 58152(11) No No 174.70 186.76 5.23 Strong
53 58868(5) Yes Yes 124.58 166.76 18.31 Decisive
56 59103(6) Yes No 240.66 328.32 38.07 Decisive
64 60027(1) Yes Yes 29.60 348.15 138.34 Decisive
65 60223(3) Yes No 222.24 246.29 10.44 Decisive

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.