Table 1.
Overview of the considered mass models and their chi-square values for the corresponding best-fit models.
| Model | SN host | weighting | d.o.f. | χimg2 | χext2 | χred2 | χimg,S24,w2 | χext,orig2 | RMS (w) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S24 | Y | χimg2 only | 110 | 111.3 | – | 1.01 | 111.3 | 37 105 | 0 39 |
| Ew | Y | χext2-dominant | 70 272 | 394 | 68 853 | 0.99 | 394 | 30 286 | 0 73 |
| Sw | Y | χext2 ∼ χimg2 | 73 232 | 35 455 | 36 234 | 0.98 | 138.5 | 33 673 | 0 44 |
| Ewo | N | χext2-dominant | 70 151 | 357 | 69 198 | 0.97 | 361 | 30 406 | 0 70 |
| Swo | N | χext2 ∼ χimg2 | 73 371 | 34 803 | 36 212 | 0.99 | 141 | 33 654 | 0 44 |
Notes. We note that only χimg,S24,w2, χext,orig2, and RMS (w) can be fairly compared across different models, as they are computed assuming the same observational uncertainties. The columns give from left to right the model acronym, whether the SN host image positions are included (Y) or not (N), the χ2 term weighting, the number of degrees of freedom (d.o.f.), the image position chi-square value, as obtained from the optimization, the chi-square value of the extended image, as obtained from the optimization, the total reduced chi-square defined as χ2/d.o.f., the image position chi-square, adopting the uncertainties of S24 and always including the multiple image positions of the SN host, the extended chi-square value, by adopting the original error map as defined in Eq. (4), and, finally, the root mean square (RMS) from all multiple image positions (to allow for a fair comparison across the five models).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.




