Matched-sample comparison of the raw reduced shear profiles (prior to the background selection and contamination correction) obtained from the three shape catalogues, showing both the tangential component ⟨g_t⟩ and the cross-component ⟨g_×⟩. In the average computation we only include sources that have non-zero shape weights as computed by all three methods. The error bars include shape noise and are therefore correlated between the methods, explaining why the tangential reduced shear profiles obtained by the three methods differ from each other to a lesser extent than the error bars. For the KSB+ catalogue ⟨g_t⟩ is plotted at the correct position, while the other data points have been offset along the x-axis for clarity.