Table C.2.
Differences in SN Ia lightcurve data adopted in F19/U24/F25 compared to the best available data.
| SN | Used in F19/U24/F25 | Best Available | Improvement | Difference ΔBcorr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992A (Cfa I) | Suntzeff (1996) | Suntzeff (1996) | fit to UBVRI (not BV) | 0.08 mag |
| 1994ae (Cfa I) | Riess et al. (1999)(a) | Riess et al. (2005) | host subtraction, 4x phot cal. | 0.02 mag |
| 1995al (Cfa I) | Riess et al. (1999) | Riess et al. (2009b) | host subtraction, 4x phot cal. | 0.29 mag |
| 1998bu (Cfa I) | Jha et al. (1999) | Jha et al. (1999) | filter function | 0.25 mag |
| 2002fk (LOSS) | Riess et al. (2009b) | Riess et al. (2009b) | filter function | −0.06 mag |
| 2012cg (LOSS) | Marion et al. (2016) | Stahl et al. (2019) | final reduction | −0.28 mag |
| 2005cf (LOSS) | Open Source Catalogue | Stahl et al. (2019) | final reduction | −0.06 mag |
| 2005cf (LOSS) | Open Source Catalogue | Stahl et al. (2019) | final reduction | −0.04 mag |
| 2013dy (LOSS) | Open Source Catalogue | Stahl et al. (2019) | final reduction | 0.35 mag |
| 2017cbv (LOSS) | Open Source Catalogue | Stahl et al. (2019) | final reduction | −0.10 mag |
| 2011fe | Richmond & Smith (2012) | LOSS | coverage | 0.04 mag |
Notes. (a) Reference F19 claims that 1994ae used the version of the light curve from Riess et al. (2005), but C. Burns, who performed the fit, sourced the data from the Open Source Catalogue, which instead used Riess et al. (1999). We further confirm that the value in Uddin et al. (2024) matches Riess et al. (1999), not Riess et al. (2005)
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.