Open Access
Table C.4.
Comparison between recent literature results and DN emulation with the same data.
| Configuration | Literature | Reference value | Our (DN) value |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNIa (Pantheon+, R22 sample) | Riess et al. (2022a) | 73.17 ± 0.96 | 73.15 ± 0.97 |
| SNIa (BayesSN, R22 sample) | Dhawan et al. (2023) | (74.92 ± 1.09)* | 74.82 ± 1.28 |
| SNIa (SNooPy pre v2.7, F25 sample) | Freedman et al. (2025) | 70.31 ± 1.80 | 70.39 ± 1.80 |
| SNII standard candle (SC), our calibration | de Jaeger et al. (2022) |  |
73.14 ± 4.72 |
| SNII standard candle (SC), literature calibration | de Jaeger et al. (2022) |  |
75.02 ± 4.29 |
| Megamasers (no N4258, 2M++ velocities) | Pesce et al. (2020b) | 72.1 ± 2.7 | 71.77 ± 3.01 |
| SBF (corrected) | Jensen et al. (2025) | 74.17 ± 2.40 | 74.33 ± 2.22 |
| SNII EPM | Vogl et al. (2025) | 74.9 ± 1.9 | 74.83 ± 1.85 |
| DESI FP (Coma via SBF-TRGB) | Said et al. (2025) | 76.05 ± 4.90 | 76.05 ± 5.05 |
| DESI FP (Coma via SN-Cepheid) | Scolnic et al. (2025) | 76.5 ± 2.2 | 76.45 ± 2.13 |
Notes. Comparison of literature values with non-SNIa determinations of the Hubble constant from the distance network. *In this case only 41 out of the 42 SNe Ia were fit in the reference.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.