Table 2.
Comparison of fesc prediction accuracy and leaker classification performance using different A1500 estimates.
| A1500 from | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulation | CIGALE | LEPHARE | FICUS | |
| Mean error on fesc | 0.0154 | 0.0238 | 0.0215 | 0.0243 |
Mean error ( ) |
0.0027 | 0.0030 | 0.0028 | 0.0030 |
Mean error ( ) |
0.0459 | 0.0513 | 0.0566 | 0.0634 |
| Completeness | 81.6% | 87.3% | 80.7% | 76.6% |
| Precision | 81.1% | 67.6% | 78.3% | 75.9% |
Mean error on
|
0.0141 | 0.020 | 0.0186 | 0.0208 |
Mean error ( ) |
0.0016 | 0.0018 | 0.0017 | 0.0017 |
Mean error ( ) |
0.0440 | 0.0443 | 0.0505 | 0.0558 |
Completeness ( ) |
80.8% | 87.3% | 79.7% | 76.0% |
Precision ( ) |
81.6% | 69.3% | 79.7% | 78.8% |
Notes. The mean errors are absolute errors,
. The completeness and precision values refer to the identification of galaxies with fesc > 0.1 (leakers). Completeness is the number of true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false negatives, while precision is the number of true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false positives.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.






