Table 2
Individual distance estimates for PNe.
| Name | Dthiswork (kpc) | DRef (kpc) | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| We 2-5 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | Kinematic method1 |
| CVMP 1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | Kinematic method2 |
| Hen 2-11 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | Kinematic method3 |
| HFG 2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | Kinematic method4 |
| NGC 5189 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.7 | Kinematic method5 |
| SuWt 2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | Kinematic method6 |
| Abell 79 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 4.4 ± 1.0 | Kinematic method7 |
| DPV 1 | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | Outburst brightness8 |
| Hen 1-5 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | Outburst brightness8 |
| FG Sge | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | Pulsation theory9 |
| NGC 7293 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | Proper motion10 |
| Sh 2-188 | 0.9 ± 0.05 | 0.85 ± 0.5 | Convergent parallax11 |
| Abell 63 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | Eclipsing binary12 |
| SuWt 2 | 2.1 ± 0.06 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | Eclipsing binary13 |
| HFG 1 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.32 | Eclipsing binary14 |
Notes. DRef denotes distances adopted from the literature. Superscripts indicate the reference sources: 1López et al. (2012), 2Corradi et al. (1997), 3Meaburn & Walsh (1989), 4Frew (2008), 5Sabin et al. (2012), 6Jones et al. (2010), 7Rodríguez et al. (2001), 8Frew et al. (2016), 9Mayor & Acker (1980), 10Eggen (1984), 11Wareing et al. (2006), 12Bell et al. (1994), 13Exter et al. (2010), 14Exter et al. (2005).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.