Open Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554772]


Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Download original image

Corrected versions of Figs. 7 and 9 in the original paper (Razquin et al. 2025): Total unsigned magnetic flux (ϕ) compared to (a) the GOES soft X-ray peak flux, FP, (b) the magnetic dimming area, Aϕ, and (c) the mean unsigned magnetic flux density, Bus. Blue crosses represent dimmings from the May 2024 events, while grey crosses correspond to dimming events from Dissauer et al. (2018). The black (blue) regression lines are fitted exclusively to the grey (blue) data points.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.