Open Access
Table 2
Comparison with other papers.
| Paper | Values Fit | Spectral type range | Slope | CMFplanet (or similar) at Solar CMF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This paper | CMFplanet vs. CMFstar | M | 0.0 ± 0.5 | 0.19 ± 0.05 |
| Adibekyan et al. (2021) | Fe%planet vs. Fe%star | FGK | 6.3 ± 1.2 | ~0.51 |
| Liu & Ni (2023) | Fe%planet vs. Fe%star | FGKM | 10.80 ± 3.56 | ~0.43 |
| Adibekyan et al. (2024) | Fe%planet vs. Fe%star | FGK | 5.85 ± 1.07 | ~0.55 |
| Brinkman et al. (2024) | CMFplanet vs. CMFstar | GK | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
| Brinkman et al. (2025) | CMFplanet vs. CMFstar | GK | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.37 ± 0.05 |
Notes. The results of quantifying a relation between planetary and stellar CMF estimates (or proxies thereof) between this paper and other papers quantifying similar relations.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.