| Issue |
A&A
Volume 701, September 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A263 | |
| Number of page(s) | 14 | |
| Section | Catalogs and data | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553912 | |
| Published online | 24 September 2025 | |
Rotation of young solar-type stars as seen by Gaia and K2
1
INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania,
Via S. Sofia, 78,
95123
Catania,
Italy
2
University of Catania, Astrophysics Section, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy,
Via S. Sofia, 78,
95123
Catania,
Italy
3
Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM,
91191
Gif-sur-Yvette,
France
★ Corresponding author: sylvain.breton@inaf.it
Received:
27
January
2025
Accepted:
26
July
2025
Context. Accurate surface rotation measurements are crucial to estimate stellar ages and improve our understanding of stellar rotational evolution. Comparisons of datasets obtained from different space missions on common targets represent in this sense a way to explore the respective biases and reliability of the considered instruments, as well as a possibility to perform a more in-depth investigation of the properties of the observed stars.
Aims. In this perspective, we used observations from the K2 mission to provide an external validation to Gaia rotation measurements, and confront observables available from Gaia, K2, and Kepler.
Methods. We therefore cross-matched the Gaia rotation catalogue and the K2 mission Ecliptic Plane Input Catalogue (EPIC) in order to find Gaia stars with both measured rotation and periods and available K2 light curves. Using our cross-match, we analysed 1063 light curves from the K2 mission in order to characterise stellar rotational modulations and compare the recovered periods with Gaia reference values. The K2/Gaia cross-validated sample was used as a random-forest classifier training set to identify a subsample of Gaia stars with similar properties.
Results. We validate the Gaia rotation measurements for a large fraction of the sample and we discuss the possible origin of the discrepancies between some K2 and Gaia measurements. We note that the K2 sample does not include members of the low-activity ultra-fast-rotating (UFR) population that was highlighted by Gaia observations, a feature that we explain considering the instrumental capabilities of K2. Placing our sample in perspective with the full Gaia rotation catalogues and Kepler observations, we show that the population for which both Gaia and K2 are able to measure rotation is composed of young late-type stars, a significant fraction of which are not yet converged on the slow-rotator gyrochronological sequence. In order to identify additional targets that have properties similar to the cross-validated K2 sample (considering in particular rotation and activity index), we computed the local outlier factor (LOF) of the stars in the Gaia DR3 rotation catalogue, considering the K2 stars as reference, and we identified 40 423 stars with a high degree of similarity, which can be useful for future statistical studies.
Conclusions. For the purpose of characterising the properties of young solar-type fast rotators, future photometric space-borne missions such as PLATO will greatly benefit from the synergies with Gaia observations that we illustrate in this work.
Key words: stars: activity / stars: rotation / stars: solar-type / starspots
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.