| Issue |
A&A
Volume 702, October 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A207 | |
| Number of page(s) | 18 | |
| Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554474 | |
| Published online | 24 October 2025 | |
A roadmap to cosmological parameter analysis with third-order shear statistics
IV. Analytic cross-covariance between second- and third-order aperture masses
1
University of Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany
2
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
3
Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Technikerstr. 25/8, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
4
Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
5
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
6
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
⋆ Corresponding author: niek.wielders@gmail.com
Received:
11
March
2025
Accepted:
25
August
2025
Context. Weak gravitational lensing is a powerful probe of cosmology, with second-order shear statistics commonly used to constrain parameters such as the matter density Ωm and the clustering amplitude S8. However, degeneracies between parameters persist and can be broken by including higher-order statistics, such as the third-order aperture mass. To jointly analyse second- and third-order statistics, an accurate model of their cross-covariance is essential.
Aims. This work derives and validates a non-tomographic analytical model for the cross-covariance between second- and third-order aperture mass statistics. Analytical models are computationally efficient and enable cosmological parameter inference across a range of models, in contrast to numerical covariances derived from simulations or resampling methods, which are either costly or biased.
Methods. We derived the cross-covariance from real-space estimators of the aperture mass. Substituting the Halofit power spectrum, BiHalofit bispectrum, and a halo-model-based tetraspectrum, the model was validated against numerical covariances from the N-body Scinet LIghtCone Simulations (SLICS) using both shear catalogues and convergence maps. We performed a Markov chain Monte Carlo parameter analysis using both analytical and numerical covariances for several filter scale combinations.
Results. The cross-covariance separates into three terms governed by the power spectrum, bispectrum, and tetraspectrum, with the latter dominating. While the analytical model qualitatively reproduces simulation results, differences arise due to modelling approximations and numerical evaluation issues. The analytical contours are systematically tighter, with a combined figure of merit that is 72% that of the numerical case, increasing to 80% when small-scale information is excluded. These differences largely stem from an underprediction of the second-order covariance.
Conclusions. This work completes the analytical covariance framework for second- and third-order aperture mass statistics, enabling joint parameter inference without the need for large simulation suites. While further refinement is needed to improve quantitative accuracy, the model represents a key step towards simulation-independent cosmic shear analyses.
Key words: gravitational lensing: weak / methods: analytical / methods: statistical / cosmological parameters / large-scale structure of Universe
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.