| Issue |
A&A
Volume 703, November 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A58 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555221 | |
| Published online | 06 November 2025 | |
The galaxy bias profile of cosmic voids
1
Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida Vicuña Mackenna 3939, San Joaquín, Santiago, Chile
2
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, s/n, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
3
Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
4
CONICET. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental (IATE), Laprida 854, Córdoba X5000BGR, Argentina
5
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba (OAC), Laprida 854, Córdoba X5000BGR, Argentina
6
Center for Particle Cosmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
7
The Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, Trieste 34151, Italy
8
Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan
9
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
10
Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Casilla 110-V, Avda. España 1680, Valparaíso, Chile
11
Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Casilla 4950, Valparaíso, Chile
⋆ Corresponding author: antonio.montero@usm.cl
Received:
19
April
2025
Accepted:
2
September
2025
Context. Cosmic voids are underdense regions within the large-scale structure of the Universe, spanning a wide range of physical scales – from a few megaparsecs to the largest observable structures. Their distinctive properties make them valuable cosmological probes and unique laboratories for galaxy formation studies. A key aspect to investigate in this context is the galaxy bias, b, within voids – that is, how galaxies in these underdense regions trace the underlying dark-matter density field.
Aims. We aim to measure the dependence of the large-scale galaxy bias on the distance to the void center and to evaluate whether this bias profile varies with the void properties and identification procedure.
Methods. We applied a void identification scheme based on spherical overdensities to galaxy data from the IllustrisTNG magnetohydrodynamical simulation. For the clustering measurement, we used an object-by-object estimate of large-scale galaxy bias, which offers significant advantages over the standard method based on ratios of correlation functions or power spectra.
Results. We find that the average large-scale bias of galaxies inside voids tends to increase with void-centric distance when normalized by the void radius. For the entire galaxy population within voids, the average bias rises with the density of the surrounding environment and, consequently, decreases with increasing void size. Due to this environmental dependence, the average galaxy bias inside S-type voids – embedded in large-scale overdense regions – is significantly higher (⟨b⟩in > 0) at all distances compared to R-type voids, which are surrounded by underdense regions (⟨b⟩in < 0). The bias profile for S-type voids is also slightly steeper. Since the two types of voids host halo populations of similar mass, the measured difference in bias can be interpreted as a secondary bias effect.
Key words: methods: numerical / methods: statistical / galaxies: formation / galaxies: statistics / large-scale structure of Universe
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.