| Issue |
A&A
Volume 707, March 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A99 | |
| Number of page(s) | 21 | |
| Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556374 | |
| Published online | 27 February 2026 | |
A comparative test of different pressure profile models in clusters of galaxies using recent ACT data
Department of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong–Liverpool University, Suzhou Dushu Lake Science and Education Innovation District, Suzhou Industrial Park 111 Ren’ai Road Suzhou 215123, People’s Republic of China
★ Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
11
July
2025
Accepted:
13
January
2026
Abstract
Context. The electron pressure profile is a convenient tool to characterize the thermodynamic state of a galaxy cluster, with several studies adopting a “universal” functional form.
Aims. This study aims at using Sunyaev-Zel’dovich (SZ) data to test four different functional forms for the cluster pressure profile: generalized Navarro-Frenk-White (gNFW), β-model, polytropic, and exponential. The goal is to assess to what level they are universal over a population-level cluster sample.
Methods. A set of 3496 ACT–DR4 galaxy clusters, spanning the mass range [1014,1015.1] M⊙ and the redshift range [0, 2], is stacked on the ACT–DR6 Compton parameter y map over ∼13 000 deg2. An angular Compton profile is then extracted and modeled using the theoretical pressure recipes, whose free parameters are constrained against the measurement via a multistage Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. The analysis is repeated over cluster subsamples spanning narrower mass and redshift ranges.
Results. All functional forms are effective in reproducing the measured y profiles within their error bars, without a clearly favored model. While best-fit estimates are in broad agreement with previous findings, hints of residual subsample dependency are detected favoring higher amplitudes and steeper profiles in high-mass, low-redshift clusters.
Conclusions. Population-level cluster studies based on SZ data alone are likely unable to accurately constrain different pressure profile models. Residual trends at the population level as well as scatter at the individual cluster level undermine the universal pressure model assumption whenever high precision is required. Finally, functional forms that differ from the gNFW prove equally effective while being more physically motivated.
Key words: galaxies: clusters: general / galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium / large-scale structure of Universe
© The Authors 2026
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.